Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang

Unnao rape case: Sengar’s sentence hearing adjourned to December 20

The Delhi District Court today, heard submissions to decide upon the quantum of sentence to be given to ex-MLA of BJP, Kuldeep Sengar, for being convicted on charges of rape under IPC as well as under POCSO.

17 Dec 2019

SentencedImage Courtesy: ANI


Arguments were put forth by both parties where the prosecutor representing CBI asked for maximum punishment and compensation for the survivor. The CBI prosecutor also argued against taking a lenient stand or liberal view towards sentencing. The prosecutor sought compensation under section 357 and 357A of the CrPC.

Counsel for the accused submitted that the convict’s social work must be taken into consideration when deciding quantum of sentence. He also pointed out that throughout his stay in Tihar Jail, the convict has displayed good conduct and he has not been a ‘menace to society’.

His counsel also said that if fine is being imposed then compensation may not be given to the victim as the Judge had pointed out that already a compensation of Rs. 25 lakhs has been given to the survivor. The judge noted that no amount of compensation can repair the injury caused to the survivor, yet he asked for nomination papers of the convict Sengar to be presented on December to determine his financial status in order to determine the compensation amount.

While pronouncing the judgment, the district judge, Dharmesh Sharma, had observed that, “Sengar was a powerful person, the victim was a village girl, not from a cosmopolitan educated area which led to delay in filing case. I found her statement truthful, unblemished that she was sexually assaulted and under threat”.

The Court convicted Sengar on December 16 under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 5(c) and 6 of POCSO Act. Both charges under IPC as well as the POCSO Act provide for minimum rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and maximum punishment of life imprisonment as well as fine.
 

Related:

Unnao rape case: Kuldeep Singh Sengar convicted
Unnao accident witness claims murder bid on self

Death Penalty In POCSO Act Imperils Child Victims Of Sexual Offences
Oppn slams BJP for selective targeting of Rape Survivor in Chinmayanand Case
Selective Silence & Outrage: The Unnao Story
SC transfers Unnao case to Delhi, orders CBI to complete probe in 7 days
Unnao Story Is The Failure Of Indian system

Vociferous protests by Civil Society and Political Parties as Unnao survivor battles for life

Unnao rape case: Sengar’s sentence hearing adjourned to December 20

The Delhi District Court today, heard submissions to decide upon the quantum of sentence to be given to ex-MLA of BJP, Kuldeep Sengar, for being convicted on charges of rape under IPC as well as under POCSO.

SentencedImage Courtesy: ANI


Arguments were put forth by both parties where the prosecutor representing CBI asked for maximum punishment and compensation for the survivor. The CBI prosecutor also argued against taking a lenient stand or liberal view towards sentencing. The prosecutor sought compensation under section 357 and 357A of the CrPC.

Counsel for the accused submitted that the convict’s social work must be taken into consideration when deciding quantum of sentence. He also pointed out that throughout his stay in Tihar Jail, the convict has displayed good conduct and he has not been a ‘menace to society’.

His counsel also said that if fine is being imposed then compensation may not be given to the victim as the Judge had pointed out that already a compensation of Rs. 25 lakhs has been given to the survivor. The judge noted that no amount of compensation can repair the injury caused to the survivor, yet he asked for nomination papers of the convict Sengar to be presented on December to determine his financial status in order to determine the compensation amount.

While pronouncing the judgment, the district judge, Dharmesh Sharma, had observed that, “Sengar was a powerful person, the victim was a village girl, not from a cosmopolitan educated area which led to delay in filing case. I found her statement truthful, unblemished that she was sexually assaulted and under threat”.

The Court convicted Sengar on December 16 under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 5(c) and 6 of POCSO Act. Both charges under IPC as well as the POCSO Act provide for minimum rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and maximum punishment of life imprisonment as well as fine.
 

Related:

Unnao rape case: Kuldeep Singh Sengar convicted
Unnao accident witness claims murder bid on self

Death Penalty In POCSO Act Imperils Child Victims Of Sexual Offences
Oppn slams BJP for selective targeting of Rape Survivor in Chinmayanand Case
Selective Silence & Outrage: The Unnao Story
SC transfers Unnao case to Delhi, orders CBI to complete probe in 7 days
Unnao Story Is The Failure Of Indian system

Vociferous protests by Civil Society and Political Parties as Unnao survivor battles for life

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Unnao: Rape accused gets bail, survivor sets herself ablaze

Another day, another survivor of rape falls victim to the criminal justice system. The police lodged a case of abetment to suicide against the accused who was granted anticipatory bail in a case of allegedly committing rape and extorting money from the now 23-year-old survivor.

17 Dec 2019

rape case

The survivor suffered 70 percent burns after she attempted to commit suicide by setting herself ablaze outside the District Police Office. She is admitted to Hallet Hospital in Kanpur. The survivor is a graduate living with her parents and brothers while the accused is an agricultural labourer. According to eyewitnesses she soaked herself in an inflammable substance, and after reaching the district police office, set herself afire. She ran towards the police premises, still engulfed in fire which was doused by the officers. She remains critical.

If this is indeed a case of abetment, this is no different from the case witnessed by this country in Unnao itself, hardly two weeks ago, whereby a rape survivor was set on fire by men accused of raping her and few others. She succumbed to her injuries few days later. In this case as well the rape accused were set free on bail.

In a chargesheet filed on December 13, the main accused Awadhesh Singh has been charged for rape and 3 other accused, namely, Raju, Sarvesh and his wife Rachna have been charged for criminal intimidation.

In her rape complaint, the survivor alleged that Awadhesh Singh had been sexually exploiting her for last 10 years on pretext of marriage and was also extorting money from her. When she asked him to marry her, he refused and instead threatened to kill her. She also stated that FIR was not registered despite of submitting complaint to District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police. She also stated that all 4 accused had come to her house and had tried to kill her. She apprehended that the accused can kill her any time and that they are pressurizing her to compromise. There was clear apprehension of threat to her life and yet anticipatory bail was granted to a person accused of rape.

Reportedly, during the bail hearing, the counsel or the accused had submitted that the survivor’s family had filed a molestation case against another man in order to extort money and argued that similar tactic was being used against the accused in this case.

Unnao: Rape accused gets bail, survivor sets herself ablaze

Another day, another survivor of rape falls victim to the criminal justice system. The police lodged a case of abetment to suicide against the accused who was granted anticipatory bail in a case of allegedly committing rape and extorting money from the now 23-year-old survivor.

rape case

The survivor suffered 70 percent burns after she attempted to commit suicide by setting herself ablaze outside the District Police Office. She is admitted to Hallet Hospital in Kanpur. The survivor is a graduate living with her parents and brothers while the accused is an agricultural labourer. According to eyewitnesses she soaked herself in an inflammable substance, and after reaching the district police office, set herself afire. She ran towards the police premises, still engulfed in fire which was doused by the officers. She remains critical.

If this is indeed a case of abetment, this is no different from the case witnessed by this country in Unnao itself, hardly two weeks ago, whereby a rape survivor was set on fire by men accused of raping her and few others. She succumbed to her injuries few days later. In this case as well the rape accused were set free on bail.

In a chargesheet filed on December 13, the main accused Awadhesh Singh has been charged for rape and 3 other accused, namely, Raju, Sarvesh and his wife Rachna have been charged for criminal intimidation.

In her rape complaint, the survivor alleged that Awadhesh Singh had been sexually exploiting her for last 10 years on pretext of marriage and was also extorting money from her. When she asked him to marry her, he refused and instead threatened to kill her. She also stated that FIR was not registered despite of submitting complaint to District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police. She also stated that all 4 accused had come to her house and had tried to kill her. She apprehended that the accused can kill her any time and that they are pressurizing her to compromise. There was clear apprehension of threat to her life and yet anticipatory bail was granted to a person accused of rape.

Reportedly, during the bail hearing, the counsel or the accused had submitted that the survivor’s family had filed a molestation case against another man in order to extort money and argued that similar tactic was being used against the accused in this case.

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Unnao rape case: Kuldeep Singh Sengar convicted

With the increasing number of crimes being reported against women in the country and the growing sentiment of retribution among the masses, this verdict can become the means to restore people’s faith in the criminal justice system.

16 Dec 2019

RapeImage Courtesy: ndtv.com

A District Court found Kuldeep Sengar guilty in the high-profile case that sent shock-waves ever sinceit first came to light in April 2018, when the survivor tried to commit self immolation outside UP Chief Minsiter Yogi Adityanath’s home demanding justice. Sengar’s co-accused Shashi Singh was acquitted, giving him benefit of doubt.

The court observed, “Sengar was a powerful person, the victim was a village girl, not from a cosmopolitan educated area which led to delay in filing case. I found her statement truthful, unblemished that she was sexually assaulted and under threat”.

The Court convicted Sengar under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 5(c) of POCSO Act for the offence of public servant committing penetrative sexual assault against a child. Reportedly, Kuldeep Sengar broke down after hearing the verdict in court. The survivor, now aged 19, was a minor at the time of the fateful incident.

The crime was committed in 2017, but Sengar who was only recently expelled by the BJP, used his political might to ensure he escaped justice for as long as he could. He was arrested only in April 2018, days after the survivor threatened to set herself ablaze in from the UP Chief Minister, Yogi Adityanath’s Home in Lucknow. Sengar was a four-time BJP MLA from Bangermaru in UP; he was expelled, a little too late, a year later, in April this year.

Though the crime was committed in UP, the case was transferred to Delhi as per directions of the Supreme Court after the then CJI received a letter from the survivor, a girl who was a minor at the time of the rape, that she was being threatened by Sengar. In fact, the survivor and her lawyer sustained grievous injuries and escaped within an inch of their lives in July this year, when a truck rammed into their vehicle on their way to court. The survivor lost both her aunts in the accident that is being viewed by many as a premeditated attack to silence the survivor for good.

The incident involving the truck once again highlighted the importance of having a strong victim/witness protection programme that needs to be effectively implemented, especially in cases of rape.

After this incident, CRPF security was provided to the survivor and her family members. The survivor’s statement was recorded by a special court in in-camera proceedings while she was recovering in AIIMS, Delhi after having been airlifted from UP. Earier, the survivor’s father died under mysterious circumstances in police custody after being allegedly framed in an illegal arms case. A local court has framed charges of murder against Sengar, his brother Atul and 9 others in this case too.

The proceedings

The proceedings of this case were taking place in-camera i.e. without an audience, in closed court room and during this, thirteen prosecution witnesses and nine defence witnesses were examined; the mother and uncle of the survivor being the key witnesses.

The court had framed charges against the two accused under IPC sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 363 (kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping or inducing a woman to compel for marriage), 376 (rape) and other relevant sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The quantum of the sentence has not yet been decided and the accused will be heard on the quantum on December 19. Both charges under IPC as well as the POCSO Act provide for minimum rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and maximum punishment of life imprisonment as well as fine.

Unnao rape case: Kuldeep Singh Sengar convicted

With the increasing number of crimes being reported against women in the country and the growing sentiment of retribution among the masses, this verdict can become the means to restore people’s faith in the criminal justice system.

RapeImage Courtesy: ndtv.com

A District Court found Kuldeep Sengar guilty in the high-profile case that sent shock-waves ever sinceit first came to light in April 2018, when the survivor tried to commit self immolation outside UP Chief Minsiter Yogi Adityanath’s home demanding justice. Sengar’s co-accused Shashi Singh was acquitted, giving him benefit of doubt.

The court observed, “Sengar was a powerful person, the victim was a village girl, not from a cosmopolitan educated area which led to delay in filing case. I found her statement truthful, unblemished that she was sexually assaulted and under threat”.

The Court convicted Sengar under section 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 5(c) of POCSO Act for the offence of public servant committing penetrative sexual assault against a child. Reportedly, Kuldeep Sengar broke down after hearing the verdict in court. The survivor, now aged 19, was a minor at the time of the fateful incident.

The crime was committed in 2017, but Sengar who was only recently expelled by the BJP, used his political might to ensure he escaped justice for as long as he could. He was arrested only in April 2018, days after the survivor threatened to set herself ablaze in from the UP Chief Minister, Yogi Adityanath’s Home in Lucknow. Sengar was a four-time BJP MLA from Bangermaru in UP; he was expelled, a little too late, a year later, in April this year.

Though the crime was committed in UP, the case was transferred to Delhi as per directions of the Supreme Court after the then CJI received a letter from the survivor, a girl who was a minor at the time of the rape, that she was being threatened by Sengar. In fact, the survivor and her lawyer sustained grievous injuries and escaped within an inch of their lives in July this year, when a truck rammed into their vehicle on their way to court. The survivor lost both her aunts in the accident that is being viewed by many as a premeditated attack to silence the survivor for good.

The incident involving the truck once again highlighted the importance of having a strong victim/witness protection programme that needs to be effectively implemented, especially in cases of rape.

After this incident, CRPF security was provided to the survivor and her family members. The survivor’s statement was recorded by a special court in in-camera proceedings while she was recovering in AIIMS, Delhi after having been airlifted from UP. Earier, the survivor’s father died under mysterious circumstances in police custody after being allegedly framed in an illegal arms case. A local court has framed charges of murder against Sengar, his brother Atul and 9 others in this case too.

The proceedings

The proceedings of this case were taking place in-camera i.e. without an audience, in closed court room and during this, thirteen prosecution witnesses and nine defence witnesses were examined; the mother and uncle of the survivor being the key witnesses.

The court had framed charges against the two accused under IPC sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 363 (kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping or inducing a woman to compel for marriage), 376 (rape) and other relevant sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The quantum of the sentence has not yet been decided and the accused will be heard on the quantum on December 19. Both charges under IPC as well as the POCSO Act provide for minimum rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and maximum punishment of life imprisonment as well as fine.

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Who killed the Hyderabad rape accused?

This is not the first time that guns and the bullet have been used to get at those labelled criminals. For Sajjanar, handling the high profile rape case of Hyderabad veterinary doctor, of the three ‘encounters’ of non-Maoists in Telangana in 10 years, two were led by the same cop

06 Dec 2019
hyderabad cop
Cyberabad Police Commissioner V C Sajjanar 


The police officer from the Hyderabad police, was SP Warrangal ( Sajjanar), when three persons accused of throwing acid on two girls were shot dead in an encounter on December 12, 2008. Now at about 3 a.m. on December 6, 2019, media reports tell us that the ‘encounter of four accused’ in the rape and murder of the 27 year old veterinarian doctor in Hyderabad that had generated nationwide outrage is the third in 10 years in Telangana not involving Maoists by the same officer. The accused were reportedly taken to Chattapally, 30 km from Hyderabad, post-midnight in an attempt to recreate the crime scene when they allegedly tried to escape after attacking the police. Officials have been on record with sections of the media stating that the police fired at them in self-defence and killed all four on the spot.


2008 ‘encounter’ in acid attack case 

The first encounter dates back to December 12, 2008, when the Warangal police shot down, in cold blood, three persons allegedly accused of throwing acid on two girls. It was none other than present day Cyberabad Police Commissioner VC Sajjanar, who is handling the Hyderabad rape case, led the 2008 action as the SP of Warangal.

At that time 11 years ago too, the police had claimed that those ‘accused’ in the acid attack case were shot dead in self-defence as they had tried to attack the police and escape. According to the police, the trio was taken to a place near Muvunur where they had hidden the motorcycle used during the incident. But as soon as they neared the vehicle, the accused whipped out a revolver and knives hidden in the motorcycle and tried to attack the police.

Police had claimed that the men had asked the escort to stop to answer nature’s call and while reboarding the bus, tried to snatch weapons from the police. All five of them were killed in self-defence, police had said. The encounter took place a week after two SIMI activists shot dead four policemen while trying to escape a check post in Nalgonda district. Civil rights activists have however repeatedly claimed it was a staged encounter and that the five men were killed to avenge the death of the policemen.

Who killed the Hyderabad rape accused?

This is not the first time that guns and the bullet have been used to get at those labelled criminals. For Sajjanar, handling the high profile rape case of Hyderabad veterinary doctor, of the three ‘encounters’ of non-Maoists in Telangana in 10 years, two were led by the same cop

hyderabad cop
Cyberabad Police Commissioner V C Sajjanar 


The police officer from the Hyderabad police, was SP Warrangal ( Sajjanar), when three persons accused of throwing acid on two girls were shot dead in an encounter on December 12, 2008. Now at about 3 a.m. on December 6, 2019, media reports tell us that the ‘encounter of four accused’ in the rape and murder of the 27 year old veterinarian doctor in Hyderabad that had generated nationwide outrage is the third in 10 years in Telangana not involving Maoists by the same officer. The accused were reportedly taken to Chattapally, 30 km from Hyderabad, post-midnight in an attempt to recreate the crime scene when they allegedly tried to escape after attacking the police. Officials have been on record with sections of the media stating that the police fired at them in self-defence and killed all four on the spot.


2008 ‘encounter’ in acid attack case 

The first encounter dates back to December 12, 2008, when the Warangal police shot down, in cold blood, three persons allegedly accused of throwing acid on two girls. It was none other than present day Cyberabad Police Commissioner VC Sajjanar, who is handling the Hyderabad rape case, led the 2008 action as the SP of Warangal.

At that time 11 years ago too, the police had claimed that those ‘accused’ in the acid attack case were shot dead in self-defence as they had tried to attack the police and escape. According to the police, the trio was taken to a place near Muvunur where they had hidden the motorcycle used during the incident. But as soon as they neared the vehicle, the accused whipped out a revolver and knives hidden in the motorcycle and tried to attack the police.

Police had claimed that the men had asked the escort to stop to answer nature’s call and while reboarding the bus, tried to snatch weapons from the police. All five of them were killed in self-defence, police had said. The encounter took place a week after two SIMI activists shot dead four policemen while trying to escape a check post in Nalgonda district. Civil rights activists have however repeatedly claimed it was a staged encounter and that the five men were killed to avenge the death of the policemen.

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

All four accused in Hyderabad vet rape & shot dead

06 Dec 2019

Hyderabad Police Encounter

Hyderabad/New Delhi: The extra judicial killing took place at 3 am on Friday, close to where the accused had allegedly burnt the woman's body. The Cyberabad police has given this information to the media and world. According to police officials, the accused were taken to the crime scene to recreate the incident of the crime, when they reportedly tried to escape. 

 DCP Shamshabad Prakash Reddy said, “Cyberabad Police had brought the accused people to the crime spot for re-construction of the sequence of events. The accused snatched weapon and fired on police. In self defence, the police fired back, in which the accused were killed.”

The men were rushed to a nearby hospital but they succumbed to bullet injuries.  The father of the veterinarian said, “It has been 10 days to the day my daughter died. I express my gratitude towards the police and the government for this. My daughter's soul must be at peace now.”

Speaking to media, the sister of the Hyderabad vet said, "I am happy the four accused have been killed in an encounter. This incident would set an example. I thank the police and media for their support."

The men, identified as Mohammed (26), Jollu Shiva (20), Jollu Naveen (20) and Chintakunta Chennakeshavulu (20), were arrested on November 29 for allegedly raping and killing the woman by smothering her and later burning her body.

The police alleged that one of the four accused had gestured to the other three to flee after attacking the cops. The four tried to run towards a deserted pathway when cops opened fire in self-defence, an official told The Indian Express. He added the accused were taken for the recce in the middle of the night “to avoid confrontation with the public, who are angry.”


Also Read
Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims
Five Actions You Can Take To End Gender Based Violence
35 year-old attempts to rape 4 year-old, paraded naked: Nagpur
Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation
Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims

All four accused in Hyderabad vet rape & shot dead

Hyderabad Police Encounter

Hyderabad/New Delhi: The extra judicial killing took place at 3 am on Friday, close to where the accused had allegedly burnt the woman's body. The Cyberabad police has given this information to the media and world. According to police officials, the accused were taken to the crime scene to recreate the incident of the crime, when they reportedly tried to escape. 

 DCP Shamshabad Prakash Reddy said, “Cyberabad Police had brought the accused people to the crime spot for re-construction of the sequence of events. The accused snatched weapon and fired on police. In self defence, the police fired back, in which the accused were killed.”

The men were rushed to a nearby hospital but they succumbed to bullet injuries.  The father of the veterinarian said, “It has been 10 days to the day my daughter died. I express my gratitude towards the police and the government for this. My daughter's soul must be at peace now.”

Speaking to media, the sister of the Hyderabad vet said, "I am happy the four accused have been killed in an encounter. This incident would set an example. I thank the police and media for their support."

The men, identified as Mohammed (26), Jollu Shiva (20), Jollu Naveen (20) and Chintakunta Chennakeshavulu (20), were arrested on November 29 for allegedly raping and killing the woman by smothering her and later burning her body.

The police alleged that one of the four accused had gestured to the other three to flee after attacking the cops. The four tried to run towards a deserted pathway when cops opened fire in self-defence, an official told The Indian Express. He added the accused were taken for the recce in the middle of the night “to avoid confrontation with the public, who are angry.”


Also Read
Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims
Five Actions You Can Take To End Gender Based Violence
35 year-old attempts to rape 4 year-old, paraded naked: Nagpur
Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation
Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

What criminals could not achieve has now been legitimised by the Court: December 6

06 Dec 2019

Babri demolition

The author visited Ayodhya one month after the demolition of Babri mosque by the RSS/Shiv Sena/BJP cadres. It presented a picture of carnage, devastation, criminal participation of the Indian State in it but there were also clear underlining signs that pointed to the fact that secularism was not dead in Ayodhya. But today, on the 27th anniversary of the demolition of the Babri mosque I am not so sure, specially after the Supreme Court judgment on November 9, 2019, handing over the mosque site to those who had razed the mosque. The moral of the story is that what criminals could not achieve on December 6, 1992, has been legitimised by the highest court of justice of India.

The short report is being produced in full, courtesy The Sunday Times of India.

Publication Date: Jan 17, 1993

Publication Name: The Sunday Times of India, Delhi.

shamsul islam

December 6, 2019

Link for some of S. Islam's writings in English, Hindi, Urdu, Marathi, Malayalam, Kannada, Bengali, Punjabi, Gujarati and video interviews/debates:

http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam

What criminals could not achieve has now been legitimised by the Court: December 6

Babri demolition

The author visited Ayodhya one month after the demolition of Babri mosque by the RSS/Shiv Sena/BJP cadres. It presented a picture of carnage, devastation, criminal participation of the Indian State in it but there were also clear underlining signs that pointed to the fact that secularism was not dead in Ayodhya. But today, on the 27th anniversary of the demolition of the Babri mosque I am not so sure, specially after the Supreme Court judgment on November 9, 2019, handing over the mosque site to those who had razed the mosque. The moral of the story is that what criminals could not achieve on December 6, 1992, has been legitimised by the highest court of justice of India.

The short report is being produced in full, courtesy The Sunday Times of India.

Publication Date: Jan 17, 1993

Publication Name: The Sunday Times of India, Delhi.

shamsul islam

December 6, 2019

Link for some of S. Islam's writings in English, Hindi, Urdu, Marathi, Malayalam, Kannada, Bengali, Punjabi, Gujarati and video interviews/debates:

http://du-in.academia.edu/ShamsulIslam

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Unnao rape survivor set ablaze by accused!

She was on her way to the hearing in the case when an accused who was out on bail got together with his accomplices and set her on fire.

05 Dec 2019

Unnao Rape

In yet example of the impunity with which perpetrators intimidate and silence witnesses, a rape survivor from Unnao was set ablaze by a group of men who had raped her. Reports say that the rape accused and his friends took the woman outside her village, into the fields and doused her with petrol before setting her on fire.

The incident took place at Sindupur village under the Bihar Police station area on Thursday morning when she was on her way to Rai Bareilly for a hearing in the case. The victim has sustained 80% burns and has been admitted to the Trauma Center of the King George Medical University, Lucknow.

The accused are reported to be Shivam Trivedi, Shubham Trivedi, Harishankar Trivedi, Ramkishor Trivedi and Umesh Bajpayee. The police say that three of the men have been arrested and that the lookout for the other two is on. Out of the three accused, one is the man against who she had filed the rape charges in March this year.

SK Bhagat, senior police officer from Lucknow, told reporters , "In her FIR, the woman said that one of the two rape-accused was in relationship with her in 2018 but he physically exploited her, lured her with a marriage proposal. Later, he refused to get married and raped her with another friend." While registering the rape charges, she had also alleged that the men had made a video about the incident. One of the accused had been arrested but got out after getting bail on November 30 and allegedly decided to take revenge.

The Asian Age reports that after she was set on fire, she ran for a while before eyewitnesses saw her and informed the police. The police then sent her to the Community Health Centre from where she was sent to the district Shyama Prasad Mukherjee hospital, before being referred to Lucknow.
 

Reactions are pouring in, will justice too?

The gravity of the incident has shaken up the political class of Uttar Pradesh. The Rajya Sabha was adjourned after the Congress wanted discussions on the incident. However, since the matter was not listen, Chairman of the House, N Venkaiah Naidu did not allow any discussion on the same. He later adjourned the House over the rising furore by the Opposition parties.

Republic World reported Sakshi Maharaj, Unnao MP and BJP leader as saying, "It is a very unfortunate incident and any amount on the condemnation is less. I had put in all my efforts when the rape case had occurred. The accused were sent to jail, not via Unnao, but Rae Bareli. They were granted bail a few days ago and today when the girl left her house at 4:30 AM, the accused had tried to kill her by setting her on fire. I hope that such accused should be hanged to death.”

The National Commission of Women too has taken suo-motu cognizance of the case and asked the UP police to take action on the same at the earliest.

 


UP CM Yogi Adityanath has said that the treatment expenses will be borne by the government and strict action will be taken against the accused.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra too pulled up the UP government in her reaction. She tweeted that in the wake of such heinous crimes against women in UP, it was clear that the administration was lying of a good law and order situation in the state.


Sharad Pawar too implored the state and central government to take immediate action in the matter.
 


Advocate and MP Majeed Memon too spoke about the matter. In his tweet he said –

 


Shama Mohamed, Congress member also spoke about the negligence of the police to provide any protection to the victim in such an important case.

 


The incident of this 23-year-old woman in Unnao has come close on the heels of the rape and murder of the veterinary doctor in Hyderabad which enraged the country. It has been noted that the state and central governments have also not implemented the Justice Verma Committee Report 2013 recommendations that list out guidelines for women’s safety and making public spaces safer for women.

The country is demanding higher convictions in cases of crimes and stricter sentences for the accused. Will the police, the judiciary and the government take notice of the increasing incidents of crime against women in the country or will it react after it’s too late?

 


Related:

Violence against women – more than just a law & order problem
Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims
WCD Ministry offers up cookie-cutter answers to
 queries on domestic violence
Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation

Unnao rape survivor set ablaze by accused!

She was on her way to the hearing in the case when an accused who was out on bail got together with his accomplices and set her on fire.

Unnao Rape

In yet example of the impunity with which perpetrators intimidate and silence witnesses, a rape survivor from Unnao was set ablaze by a group of men who had raped her. Reports say that the rape accused and his friends took the woman outside her village, into the fields and doused her with petrol before setting her on fire.

The incident took place at Sindupur village under the Bihar Police station area on Thursday morning when she was on her way to Rai Bareilly for a hearing in the case. The victim has sustained 80% burns and has been admitted to the Trauma Center of the King George Medical University, Lucknow.

The accused are reported to be Shivam Trivedi, Shubham Trivedi, Harishankar Trivedi, Ramkishor Trivedi and Umesh Bajpayee. The police say that three of the men have been arrested and that the lookout for the other two is on. Out of the three accused, one is the man against who she had filed the rape charges in March this year.

SK Bhagat, senior police officer from Lucknow, told reporters , "In her FIR, the woman said that one of the two rape-accused was in relationship with her in 2018 but he physically exploited her, lured her with a marriage proposal. Later, he refused to get married and raped her with another friend." While registering the rape charges, she had also alleged that the men had made a video about the incident. One of the accused had been arrested but got out after getting bail on November 30 and allegedly decided to take revenge.

The Asian Age reports that after she was set on fire, she ran for a while before eyewitnesses saw her and informed the police. The police then sent her to the Community Health Centre from where she was sent to the district Shyama Prasad Mukherjee hospital, before being referred to Lucknow.
 

Reactions are pouring in, will justice too?

The gravity of the incident has shaken up the political class of Uttar Pradesh. The Rajya Sabha was adjourned after the Congress wanted discussions on the incident. However, since the matter was not listen, Chairman of the House, N Venkaiah Naidu did not allow any discussion on the same. He later adjourned the House over the rising furore by the Opposition parties.

Republic World reported Sakshi Maharaj, Unnao MP and BJP leader as saying, "It is a very unfortunate incident and any amount on the condemnation is less. I had put in all my efforts when the rape case had occurred. The accused were sent to jail, not via Unnao, but Rae Bareli. They were granted bail a few days ago and today when the girl left her house at 4:30 AM, the accused had tried to kill her by setting her on fire. I hope that such accused should be hanged to death.”

The National Commission of Women too has taken suo-motu cognizance of the case and asked the UP police to take action on the same at the earliest.

 


UP CM Yogi Adityanath has said that the treatment expenses will be borne by the government and strict action will be taken against the accused.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra too pulled up the UP government in her reaction. She tweeted that in the wake of such heinous crimes against women in UP, it was clear that the administration was lying of a good law and order situation in the state.


Sharad Pawar too implored the state and central government to take immediate action in the matter.
 


Advocate and MP Majeed Memon too spoke about the matter. In his tweet he said –

 


Shama Mohamed, Congress member also spoke about the negligence of the police to provide any protection to the victim in such an important case.

 


The incident of this 23-year-old woman in Unnao has come close on the heels of the rape and murder of the veterinary doctor in Hyderabad which enraged the country. It has been noted that the state and central governments have also not implemented the Justice Verma Committee Report 2013 recommendations that list out guidelines for women’s safety and making public spaces safer for women.

The country is demanding higher convictions in cases of crimes and stricter sentences for the accused. Will the police, the judiciary and the government take notice of the increasing incidents of crime against women in the country or will it react after it’s too late?

 


Related:

Violence against women – more than just a law & order problem
Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims
WCD Ministry offers up cookie-cutter answers to
 queries on domestic violence
Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Sultanpur Rape Case: NHRC pulls up Uttar Pradesh police for negligence

The Commission has asked for a report from the U.P. police

05 Dec 2019

NHRC

NHRC has taken up the cudgels to ensure women’s safety in the country, as it recently asked state governments as well as the Centre to submit SOP on women’s safety measures. It is proving to be a strong entity and nodal agency for human rights and is actively taking cognizance of issues, something that is expected of a body of its stature and standing. On the same lines, it has proceeded with an inquiry in a rape case in Sultanpur, which missed the public eye but a complaint from CJP will hopefully culminate into justice for the victim.

On October 1, CJP had filed a petition before the NHRC to bring to its notice the blatant inaction and alleged representation of false facts by the police in Sultanpur District, Uttar Pradesh. The petition emphasized that “the police, clearly failed to follow protocol in terms of primary investigation and on top of that are making false claims with respect to the post mortem and are representing false facts and the reason for the same is still unknown.”


Background

On September 10, villagers from Baijapur in Sultanpur district of Uttar Pradesh woke up to the mutilated body of a young girl hung from a tree, not much unlike the Badaun rape case. The incident was also reminiscent of the Nirbhaya rape case given how a stick had been inserted in the victim’s private parts.

Though media reportage on the matter has ranged between nil to limited, CJP has been following the case ever since it came to light. Some examples of the possible instances of investigative lacunae up are as follows:

  1. The police allegedly recorded an FIR attributing the information to the owner of the field where the body was discovered. However, the man later claimed in an interview to a local journalist that he was not the one to discover the body. He also said that he was not given a copy of the FIR.
  2. The post mortem was allegedly not conducted within 24 hours of the body being discovered, leading to possible loss of key forensic information.
  3. The post mortem found several serious injuries to the victim’s private parts including tears in her uterus, but these were not mentioned by the police in their public statement where they only limited themselves to talking about strangulation as the cause of death, purportedly to put a shroud over the brutality of the crime, limiting it to just a murder case, when clearly there was a grievous sexual assault that preceded the victim’s eventual death.
  4. The police claimed that investigation was taking time as they were unable to identify the victim. However, the identity of the victim should never be a hurdle in conducting inquiries pertinent to the case.

The police investigations were proceeding at a snail’s pace in a case of such a heinous crime that needed a strong primary investigation in order to nab the culprits and also to identify the victim. Bu the lapses in procedure raised suspicions of deliberate delays and lapses and hence the NHRC was approached.


Status of the case

The case was registered by the NHRC on November 5 under Case No. 29482/24/70/2019WC. Action was taken on November 14 and an ‘Action Taken Report’ was called for by the Commission from the DGP (Director General of Police), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. The Commission has given the DGP, Uttar Pradesh time till December 29, failing which the Commission will be constrained to invoke coercive process under section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights Act for personal appearance of concerned authorities. The next date of hearing is January 7, 2020.
 

Another petition

Closely related to this case, is the case of an eminent journalist in Sultanpur who was closely monitoring and reporting on the proceedings of this case and was eventually threatened by the Superintendent of Police (SP), Sultanpur for reporting on the police inaction. CJP approached the NHRC in this matter as well, the petition can be read here


Related:

Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation
CJP petitions NHRC urging protection orders for eminent journalist, Dharmendra Mishra
Mutilated body of girl found hanging from tree in Sultanpur, Badaun 2.0?
Over a fortnight, no arrests: Activists protest ‘police inaction’ in Sultanpur rape case: UP

Sultanpur Rape Case: NHRC pulls up Uttar Pradesh police for negligence

The Commission has asked for a report from the U.P. police

NHRC

NHRC has taken up the cudgels to ensure women’s safety in the country, as it recently asked state governments as well as the Centre to submit SOP on women’s safety measures. It is proving to be a strong entity and nodal agency for human rights and is actively taking cognizance of issues, something that is expected of a body of its stature and standing. On the same lines, it has proceeded with an inquiry in a rape case in Sultanpur, which missed the public eye but a complaint from CJP will hopefully culminate into justice for the victim.

On October 1, CJP had filed a petition before the NHRC to bring to its notice the blatant inaction and alleged representation of false facts by the police in Sultanpur District, Uttar Pradesh. The petition emphasized that “the police, clearly failed to follow protocol in terms of primary investigation and on top of that are making false claims with respect to the post mortem and are representing false facts and the reason for the same is still unknown.”


Background

On September 10, villagers from Baijapur in Sultanpur district of Uttar Pradesh woke up to the mutilated body of a young girl hung from a tree, not much unlike the Badaun rape case. The incident was also reminiscent of the Nirbhaya rape case given how a stick had been inserted in the victim’s private parts.

Though media reportage on the matter has ranged between nil to limited, CJP has been following the case ever since it came to light. Some examples of the possible instances of investigative lacunae up are as follows:

  1. The police allegedly recorded an FIR attributing the information to the owner of the field where the body was discovered. However, the man later claimed in an interview to a local journalist that he was not the one to discover the body. He also said that he was not given a copy of the FIR.
  2. The post mortem was allegedly not conducted within 24 hours of the body being discovered, leading to possible loss of key forensic information.
  3. The post mortem found several serious injuries to the victim’s private parts including tears in her uterus, but these were not mentioned by the police in their public statement where they only limited themselves to talking about strangulation as the cause of death, purportedly to put a shroud over the brutality of the crime, limiting it to just a murder case, when clearly there was a grievous sexual assault that preceded the victim’s eventual death.
  4. The police claimed that investigation was taking time as they were unable to identify the victim. However, the identity of the victim should never be a hurdle in conducting inquiries pertinent to the case.

The police investigations were proceeding at a snail’s pace in a case of such a heinous crime that needed a strong primary investigation in order to nab the culprits and also to identify the victim. Bu the lapses in procedure raised suspicions of deliberate delays and lapses and hence the NHRC was approached.


Status of the case

The case was registered by the NHRC on November 5 under Case No. 29482/24/70/2019WC. Action was taken on November 14 and an ‘Action Taken Report’ was called for by the Commission from the DGP (Director General of Police), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. The Commission has given the DGP, Uttar Pradesh time till December 29, failing which the Commission will be constrained to invoke coercive process under section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights Act for personal appearance of concerned authorities. The next date of hearing is January 7, 2020.
 

Another petition

Closely related to this case, is the case of an eminent journalist in Sultanpur who was closely monitoring and reporting on the proceedings of this case and was eventually threatened by the Superintendent of Police (SP), Sultanpur for reporting on the police inaction. CJP approached the NHRC in this matter as well, the petition can be read here


Related:

Sultanpur rape case: CJP moves NHRC citing lacunae in police investigation
CJP petitions NHRC urging protection orders for eminent journalist, Dharmendra Mishra
Mutilated body of girl found hanging from tree in Sultanpur, Badaun 2.0?
Over a fortnight, no arrests: Activists protest ‘police inaction’ in Sultanpur rape case: UP

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

Violence against women – more than just a law & order problem

05 Dec 2019
violence against women
Image: Denitza Tchacarova (detail)/Wikimedia


Jaya Bachchan’s and Swati Mahiwal's outbursts, in Parliament and outside, may be understandable but they also show that our politicians have run out of ideas. They treat all incidents of violence against women as simple 'law and order' problems. Both of them have not spoken up against the culture which degrades women and makes them secondary to men. Why would they speak when they 'celebrate' so 'joyously' all the festivities where women celebrate their secondary status, like the Karwa chowth, Bhaiya Dooj,Raakhi,Sankat Chowth etc. Not only this, do read the 'good books' of Gita Press, Gorakhpur, written by Goyanka ji, which describe how a woman should live, views best known in his 'Adarsh Bharatiya Naari'.

The seriousness of our Parliamentarians can be gauged from the fact that there were just a few, who wanted to speak on the issue of violent crimes against women – you could count them on your fingers. Where is the rest of the outrage?

Just asking for the accused to be handed over to the public for ‘lynching’ is the worst kind of response from a law-maker/legislator. Can those sitting in the Parliament and Assemblies really speak like this, utter words that promote and encourage the culture of mob-lynching?

Yes, we have failed to protect our people. We have failed to take action, not just in stopping crimes against women but in a host of other spheres, too. Or else, all those whose names are listed in the Panama papers would have been behind bars, but they enjoy not only popularity but also 'respect'. Our criticisms and campaigns are very selective and targeted. When you speak about corruption, you name Lalu Yadav but will not utter a word against the Ambanis or Bachchans!

We need to devote some time to think on these issues. Professionalise your forces and law enforcing agencies. As long as these agencies are just tools of the ruling parties; to harass those who are opponents or civil society organisations, independent journalists and activists, they will never be able to look at these issues from the perspective of human rights.

Unfortunately, human rights became the 'worst' term in this country and the right wing men and women (I include Patriarchal women in this) have abused human rights defenders and feminists. It will be the Human Rights defence that we all will need, including those Hindutva champions who have often abused them.

Once we respect the individual and her autonomy over her body, we will respect her right. However, that understanding will not come unless our leaders and those who are in public services and institutions educate themselves and their children, tell students that the past is not always great and glorious. Times have changed. Women are not just family guardians or caretakers, but are leaders, too, and need equal space in all sphere of life.

All public spaces will need women's representation. They will need to deal women's issues not merely as a gender’s issues but as human rights issues. And the more women emerge from social movements into these structures, the better it would be. I wish more and more women, active on the ground, become our law-makers so that we are saved from the idiotic ideas of those who are symbolically brought out from the 'powerful' families in the name of 'women'. We do not need people from the tinsel town to 'represent' us. In the last twenty years, more and more 'brands' are entering our Parliament, which reveals the deep antipathy of our political class towards people's representation. Political leaders have made politics apolitical by bringing into public life people these 'brands', who have no interest except for 'serving' themselves and protecting their money and other business deals. If parties are so interested in women's issues, let them give fair representation to women from all segments of life, including Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs and minorities, in these law-making processes but they will not do so. Tragedy is that parties like Samajwadi Party ensure that Jaya Bachchan is in the Rajya Sabha continuously for such a long period, but never ask her about her contribution towards the ideas that her party stands for. Either the party does not stand for socialist ideas or Jaya is not bothered about socialism and social justice, but her own self. But the problem is that once she leaves Samajwadi Party or the party is not willing to give her a ticket, others will be ready to embrace her. This is the biggest scandal. It will never allow people to come up from the grassroots or from the marginalised sections, to find a place in the power structure.

Indian law makers must come out of these lynch-mob ideas and encourage a gender audit of our laws and all the institutions in order to expedite the cases of violence against women. Fast track courts are important, as also the involvement of women in our police and other public services. As parliamentarians, they cannot show helplessness when they have been given all the power. It is a clear case of evading responsibility and accountability. Expedite the process, make your executive sensitive to the issue and fix a time frame for achieving the outcome, but do not jump to the idea of mob trial and mob justice. So many innocent lives have been lost to lynch mobs and mob trials. .It is time we focus on sharpening our laws and ensuring that police and other agencies do their work efficiently and take the cases to logical conclusion in a fixed time frame work.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

NHRC, Delhi High Court spring into action, pull up governments on women’s safety measures, utilisation of Nirbhaya Fund

Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims

Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims

Stop using rape cases for communal polarization

Haryanvi ‘Influencer’ Incites Followers To Lynch The Muslim Hyd Rape-Murder Accused

Violence against women – more than just a law & order problem

violence against women
Image: Denitza Tchacarova (detail)/Wikimedia


Jaya Bachchan’s and Swati Mahiwal's outbursts, in Parliament and outside, may be understandable but they also show that our politicians have run out of ideas. They treat all incidents of violence against women as simple 'law and order' problems. Both of them have not spoken up against the culture which degrades women and makes them secondary to men. Why would they speak when they 'celebrate' so 'joyously' all the festivities where women celebrate their secondary status, like the Karwa chowth, Bhaiya Dooj,Raakhi,Sankat Chowth etc. Not only this, do read the 'good books' of Gita Press, Gorakhpur, written by Goyanka ji, which describe how a woman should live, views best known in his 'Adarsh Bharatiya Naari'.

The seriousness of our Parliamentarians can be gauged from the fact that there were just a few, who wanted to speak on the issue of violent crimes against women – you could count them on your fingers. Where is the rest of the outrage?

Just asking for the accused to be handed over to the public for ‘lynching’ is the worst kind of response from a law-maker/legislator. Can those sitting in the Parliament and Assemblies really speak like this, utter words that promote and encourage the culture of mob-lynching?

Yes, we have failed to protect our people. We have failed to take action, not just in stopping crimes against women but in a host of other spheres, too. Or else, all those whose names are listed in the Panama papers would have been behind bars, but they enjoy not only popularity but also 'respect'. Our criticisms and campaigns are very selective and targeted. When you speak about corruption, you name Lalu Yadav but will not utter a word against the Ambanis or Bachchans!

We need to devote some time to think on these issues. Professionalise your forces and law enforcing agencies. As long as these agencies are just tools of the ruling parties; to harass those who are opponents or civil society organisations, independent journalists and activists, they will never be able to look at these issues from the perspective of human rights.

Unfortunately, human rights became the 'worst' term in this country and the right wing men and women (I include Patriarchal women in this) have abused human rights defenders and feminists. It will be the Human Rights defence that we all will need, including those Hindutva champions who have often abused them.

Once we respect the individual and her autonomy over her body, we will respect her right. However, that understanding will not come unless our leaders and those who are in public services and institutions educate themselves and their children, tell students that the past is not always great and glorious. Times have changed. Women are not just family guardians or caretakers, but are leaders, too, and need equal space in all sphere of life.

All public spaces will need women's representation. They will need to deal women's issues not merely as a gender’s issues but as human rights issues. And the more women emerge from social movements into these structures, the better it would be. I wish more and more women, active on the ground, become our law-makers so that we are saved from the idiotic ideas of those who are symbolically brought out from the 'powerful' families in the name of 'women'. We do not need people from the tinsel town to 'represent' us. In the last twenty years, more and more 'brands' are entering our Parliament, which reveals the deep antipathy of our political class towards people's representation. Political leaders have made politics apolitical by bringing into public life people these 'brands', who have no interest except for 'serving' themselves and protecting their money and other business deals. If parties are so interested in women's issues, let them give fair representation to women from all segments of life, including Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs and minorities, in these law-making processes but they will not do so. Tragedy is that parties like Samajwadi Party ensure that Jaya Bachchan is in the Rajya Sabha continuously for such a long period, but never ask her about her contribution towards the ideas that her party stands for. Either the party does not stand for socialist ideas or Jaya is not bothered about socialism and social justice, but her own self. But the problem is that once she leaves Samajwadi Party or the party is not willing to give her a ticket, others will be ready to embrace her. This is the biggest scandal. It will never allow people to come up from the grassroots or from the marginalised sections, to find a place in the power structure.

Indian law makers must come out of these lynch-mob ideas and encourage a gender audit of our laws and all the institutions in order to expedite the cases of violence against women. Fast track courts are important, as also the involvement of women in our police and other public services. As parliamentarians, they cannot show helplessness when they have been given all the power. It is a clear case of evading responsibility and accountability. Expedite the process, make your executive sensitive to the issue and fix a time frame for achieving the outcome, but do not jump to the idea of mob trial and mob justice. So many innocent lives have been lost to lynch mobs and mob trials. .It is time we focus on sharpening our laws and ensuring that police and other agencies do their work efficiently and take the cases to logical conclusion in a fixed time frame work.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

NHRC, Delhi High Court spring into action, pull up governments on women’s safety measures, utilisation of Nirbhaya Fund

Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims

Reject culture of misogyny, democratise socio-cultural spaces: #Justice4RapeVictims

Stop using rape cases for communal polarization

Haryanvi ‘Influencer’ Incites Followers To Lynch The Muslim Hyd Rape-Murder Accused

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Sabrang

No country for children: 35-year-old rapes, murders 8-year-old in Karnataka

The accused approached the girl near her school and lured her away with chocolates

04 Dec 2019

child rape

In a matter of utmost shame, after the heinous rape and murder of the 27 –year-old veterinarian doctor in Hyderabad, news of the alleged rape and murder of an 8-year-old girl in Karnataka has emerged.

The horrifying incident of child sexual abuse and murder surfaced in Karnataka’s Kalaburgi on Monday evening when the police found the body of an 8-year-old girl near a storm water drain which was found after a search operation since the girl had gone missing.

The Kalaburgi police have arrested a 35-year-old man from the same village in connection with the incident. The girl who was absent from school on Monday morning, was seen with the man, Yellappa, by some villagers. He had allegedly gone to the government school where she studies in grade 2 and lured her by offering to buy her a chocolate. After the girl did not return home at 4.30 pm as usual, her worried parents rushed to school to enquire about their daughter only to be informed that she hadn’t come to school. The teachers thought she had taken the day off.

The parents then rushed to Sulepet police station where they filed a missing persons report. A team of six police officers was formed to look for her and the parents too formed a search party along with the residents of the village. At around 7.30 PM, the residents found a dress near a plot next to the storm water drain, which looked like it belonged to a little girl. They spotted the body in the canal of the Mullamari irrigation project located behind the Anganwadi centre in the village.

The police told The News Minute that the girl’s throat had been slit and she was stabbed multiple times. “We found a pair of men’s underwear near the girl’s body. When we found Yellappa, he was near the village square. His clothes were bloody and he was drunk. He was drunk when he abducted the girl. We took him into custody and questioned him,” Sulepet Police told TNM.

According to reports by TNM, Yellappa confessed to sexually assaulting and then murdering the girl. “When we arrested him, he kept saying that she did not listen to him. He was incoherent. After he became sober, we questioned him once more and he confessed to sexually assaulting and killing the girl,” the police added.

Kalaburagi Superintendent of Police Lada Martin Marbaniang confirmed the incident to IndianExpress.com and said, “A case has been registered on Monday and we are investigating.”He also said that the medical examination would confirm the details including the cause of death, but they had booked Yellappa for rape and murder and their investigation was oriented towards the same as the girl was found partially disrobed with marks of strangulation on her body.

The Sulepet police have booked Yellappa under Sections 302 (murder), 376 (rape) and sections 3(b)(2) (penetrative sexual assault) and 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act.

According to a report by the Economic Times, the Union government has proposed to set up a total of 1.023 fast-track special courts to speed-up trials of over 1.66 lakh pending cases of crime against women and children across the nation. These courts are supposed to give verdicts to at least 165 cases per year. Out of the 1,023, 389 courts are to exclusively handle cases registered under the POCSO Act.

The Department of Justice had earmarked a total budget of Rs. 767.25 crore for the same and Rs. 474 crore for one year would be given by the Centre from the Nirbhaya Fund which was created by the Centre in 2013 after the monstrous rape and murder of a student in Delhi.

However, it has come to light that the Nirbhaya Fund that has a corpus of Rs. 10 billion, has been utilized by only 4 out of the 12 states that were granted funds. What are the states doing with the money if not utilizing it for what it was meant?

According to the last statistics in 2016, over 90,000 cases registered under the POCSO Act were pending trial. 36,022 cases had been registered in 2016 itself and 15,283 were pending investigation.

The Crime in India 2017 report by the National Crime Records Bureau in October 2019, show that violence against women has risen by 83% since 2007. It mentioned that 43.2% of rape survivors were minors, under the age of 18.

If one checks news reports, there are more than 6 cases in November alone were minors were raped all over the country. Just this week, we reported of how a rape bid on a 4year-old by a 35 year-old man was thwarted in Nagpur. The Justice Verma Committee Report 2013 had made some recommendations to make public spaces safe for women, even those have not been completely implemented.

On paper, everything has been listed out elaborately. On the ground, there has been no implementation made and the proof is for everyone to see. Public outrage will only do so much, but whom does the onus really lie on?


Related:

NHRC, Delhi High Court spring into action, pull up governments on women’s safety measures, utilisation of Nirbhaya Fund
Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims
35 year-old attempts to rape 4 year-old, paraded naked: Nagpur
A Look into the Kerala Double POCSO-Suicide Case
Death Penalty In POCSO Act Imperils Child Victims Of Sexual Offences
In R City Mall, Kidzania attendant molests two girls during their school trip: Mumbai
Tamil Nadu: 13-year-old girl beheaded for refusing sexual advances
Why India’s Children Must Wait Till 2022 To Get Justice Under Law Meant To Protect Them

 

No country for children: 35-year-old rapes, murders 8-year-old in Karnataka

The accused approached the girl near her school and lured her away with chocolates

child rape

In a matter of utmost shame, after the heinous rape and murder of the 27 –year-old veterinarian doctor in Hyderabad, news of the alleged rape and murder of an 8-year-old girl in Karnataka has emerged.

The horrifying incident of child sexual abuse and murder surfaced in Karnataka’s Kalaburgi on Monday evening when the police found the body of an 8-year-old girl near a storm water drain which was found after a search operation since the girl had gone missing.

The Kalaburgi police have arrested a 35-year-old man from the same village in connection with the incident. The girl who was absent from school on Monday morning, was seen with the man, Yellappa, by some villagers. He had allegedly gone to the government school where she studies in grade 2 and lured her by offering to buy her a chocolate. After the girl did not return home at 4.30 pm as usual, her worried parents rushed to school to enquire about their daughter only to be informed that she hadn’t come to school. The teachers thought she had taken the day off.

The parents then rushed to Sulepet police station where they filed a missing persons report. A team of six police officers was formed to look for her and the parents too formed a search party along with the residents of the village. At around 7.30 PM, the residents found a dress near a plot next to the storm water drain, which looked like it belonged to a little girl. They spotted the body in the canal of the Mullamari irrigation project located behind the Anganwadi centre in the village.

The police told The News Minute that the girl’s throat had been slit and she was stabbed multiple times. “We found a pair of men’s underwear near the girl’s body. When we found Yellappa, he was near the village square. His clothes were bloody and he was drunk. He was drunk when he abducted the girl. We took him into custody and questioned him,” Sulepet Police told TNM.

According to reports by TNM, Yellappa confessed to sexually assaulting and then murdering the girl. “When we arrested him, he kept saying that she did not listen to him. He was incoherent. After he became sober, we questioned him once more and he confessed to sexually assaulting and killing the girl,” the police added.

Kalaburagi Superintendent of Police Lada Martin Marbaniang confirmed the incident to IndianExpress.com and said, “A case has been registered on Monday and we are investigating.”He also said that the medical examination would confirm the details including the cause of death, but they had booked Yellappa for rape and murder and their investigation was oriented towards the same as the girl was found partially disrobed with marks of strangulation on her body.

The Sulepet police have booked Yellappa under Sections 302 (murder), 376 (rape) and sections 3(b)(2) (penetrative sexual assault) and 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act.

According to a report by the Economic Times, the Union government has proposed to set up a total of 1.023 fast-track special courts to speed-up trials of over 1.66 lakh pending cases of crime against women and children across the nation. These courts are supposed to give verdicts to at least 165 cases per year. Out of the 1,023, 389 courts are to exclusively handle cases registered under the POCSO Act.

The Department of Justice had earmarked a total budget of Rs. 767.25 crore for the same and Rs. 474 crore for one year would be given by the Centre from the Nirbhaya Fund which was created by the Centre in 2013 after the monstrous rape and murder of a student in Delhi.

However, it has come to light that the Nirbhaya Fund that has a corpus of Rs. 10 billion, has been utilized by only 4 out of the 12 states that were granted funds. What are the states doing with the money if not utilizing it for what it was meant?

According to the last statistics in 2016, over 90,000 cases registered under the POCSO Act were pending trial. 36,022 cases had been registered in 2016 itself and 15,283 were pending investigation.

The Crime in India 2017 report by the National Crime Records Bureau in October 2019, show that violence against women has risen by 83% since 2007. It mentioned that 43.2% of rape survivors were minors, under the age of 18.

If one checks news reports, there are more than 6 cases in November alone were minors were raped all over the country. Just this week, we reported of how a rape bid on a 4year-old by a 35 year-old man was thwarted in Nagpur. The Justice Verma Committee Report 2013 had made some recommendations to make public spaces safe for women, even those have not been completely implemented.

On paper, everything has been listed out elaborately. On the ground, there has been no implementation made and the proof is for everyone to see. Public outrage will only do so much, but whom does the onus really lie on?


Related:

NHRC, Delhi High Court spring into action, pull up governments on women’s safety measures, utilisation of Nirbhaya Fund
Revisiting the Justice Verma Committee report of 2013: #JusticeForRapeVictims
35 year-old attempts to rape 4 year-old, paraded naked: Nagpur
A Look into the Kerala Double POCSO-Suicide Case
Death Penalty In POCSO Act Imperils Child Victims Of Sexual Offences
In R City Mall, Kidzania attendant molests two girls during their school trip: Mumbai
Tamil Nadu: 13-year-old girl beheaded for refusing sexual advances
Why India’s Children Must Wait Till 2022 To Get Justice Under Law Meant To Protect Them

 

Related Articles


Theme

Campaigns

Videos

Archives

IN FACT

Podcasts

Podcasts

Podcasts

Analysis

Archives

Podcasts

Subscribe to Gender