Opinion: Victimization of Brahmins is a myth

Written by Vidya Bhushan Rawat | Published on: November 23, 2018

SUB: 98% of India's population suffers at the hands of a microscopic minority and yet they are trying to portray themselves as victims. Isn’t it shameful?

 

Brahmins

Image Courtesy: http://velivada.com/
 
It is interesting to see how the one who should be protesting their systematic privilege are playing the victim card. Long back, our friend and Editor of Dalit Voice, VT Rajshekar theorised the Aryan-Zionist relationship. Rajshekar has been blunt and clear about his theory but perhaps he was too bold and open to be accepted by the political theoreticians who don our academia. But yesterday's 'hurt' feelings of the Brahmins at the ' Smash Brahmanical Patriarchy' posters has brought it again in the limelight and this time it is coming from the 'community' 'intellectuals' and not from any 'outsider'.
 
A Brahmin 'patrakar' wrote that the Brahmins have become like Jews being targeted everywhere and by everyone for no fault of theirs. Her 'sentiments' were 'echoed' by an important leader of the Congress Party too. Claims are being made that in the two-thousand-year history of India, Brahmins were not in power and got nothing as it was ruled by others. Can anything be more obnoxious than such arguments?
 
I explained yesterday too that Brahmanism or Brahmanical system is basically a caste-based hierarchical order and anyone can be like that. An individual Brahmin can be enlightened and can be out of his caste. Once you come out of your caste, you don’t remain a Brahmin or any person of caste. It purely depends on your power relations. If you are powerful, you can do things which may not be liked by the Brahmins but they will still like to be attached to you. It is true for all other communities.
 
We follow an individual leader's castes and not their ideas. Nehru was an atheist but he was always referred to as Pandit Nehru and Brahmins felt proud of him. Brahmanical Social Order was not merely being run by Brahmins but it has other actors too who were the 'lathi' holders maintaining the order. Brahmins unleashed the institutional violence that denied people knowledge while physical violence was left to the lathi holding non-Brahmin communities. The system was definitely invented by them. It was a unique invention which made India a unique country the world, where your identity and caste is already defined before you are born. All our work too became predetermined.
 
Most of the kingdoms in the past were Brahmanical because they followed strict caste order as defined by the Brahmins. You may not have been the Raja but you were the Rajgurus and the king never functioned without your advice. Don’t forget how you conducted the 'Rajyabhishek' of Shivaji Maharaj. Remember Rama Killed Shambhuk, a Shudra for reciting Vedic hymn on purely on your advice and not on his own. The non-brahmin followers were the instruments through which Brahmanism wielded its absolute power.
 
The poor Brahmins must reflect on the untouchables. Particularly those, who were forced to clean the human excreta, burning the dead, cleaning the street, skinning the dead animals and so on. You are upset with a few reserved seats which are not truly filled, but why not abolish the caste-based reservation which made you head of our religious institutions just on the basis of your birth, whether you were knowledgeable or not. Why not abolish the reservation made for the Dalits to do specific jobs without any honourable compensation? Is untouchability not a crime like apartheid? Frankly speaking, is it finished? Have we followed our constitutional values truly?
 
Great that the Brahmin intellectuals or Savarna intellectuals are accepting that they are a microscopic minority but should we be satisfied with this? The next line should make everyone think over the system created by them. How come a microscopic minority occupies all of India's huge resources. Isn’t it true that Savarnas led by the Brahmins have got access to disproportionate assets and resources? We all know that this microscopic minority is not really over 2 per cent and yet it controls every aspect of our life. Shouldn't it worry all of us? 98% of India's population suffers at the hands of a microscopic minority and yet they are trying to portray themselves as victims. Isn’t it shameful?
 
And more than that, this comparison with Jews. Yes, they were victimized by Hitler but what did they do after that. They have become worse than Hitler. Is the Israel state a role model for anyone? Yes, it is for those who want to follow their model. Why is the Jew hatred not towards Hitler but towards the Muslims? What did Muslim do to receive this barbaric treatment by the Jewish state? You settled over their homeland and now you want them to be out. Are the Brahmins following the same pattern here? You occupy the Dravidian land and now you want to control them through dubious means when democracy is shaking the old structures.
 
I don’t believe that democracy today could shake the Brahmanical control over India but it has jolted many because you have to make way for others. You have to sit with those who you hated once. You had knowledge but your knowledge did not strengthen democracy. Instead, your knowledge became an instrument to control the minds of others who you denied knowledge.
 
Brahmanism or Brahmanical System or Brahmanical social order or Brahmanical Patriarchy need to be smashed but the problem is how?
 
My answer to this is to follow Dr. Ambedkar's alternative in Buddhism which is basically humanism. Humanism is the only alternative. Smashing hierarchies and creating an equal society will only be possible once we admit that there was a problem in the first place. Followed by democratic redistribution of resources among all. If we are not ready to accept and acknowledge that the Bahujan masses were maltreated and looked down upon by the caste structures created by Manu, it is difficult. If you don’t admit it, the others will follow the same caste identities and it will take us nowhere except that some politicians and their parties may grow. But in all, India will remain lagging behind in the human development index.
 
As long as young couples are being killed in the name of maintaining caste supremacy and the purity of it, we will continue to feel that India remains caged in the prism of the deep-rooted caste-based system which is called Brahmanism. So long as Manu's statue stands inside High Court premises and lawyers fight for its installation there without feeling shameful, we feel that this Brahmanical system is there. So long a single man and woman is dying inside the dirt of the sewage system, it will only prove that India has not moved an inch in removing the caste-based hierarchies, in fact, they are increasing.
 
I have no faith in arguments that every individual who is born in a certain caste is a saint or a sinner but it is time when we acknowledge these issues. There are many who are coming out of their privileges and extending solidarity against caste discrimination and untouchability. Many of the enlightened people had joined Baba Saheb Ambedkar's movement and rejected the Manuwad. We need more such voices. Such people and voices need to be acknowledged. A twenty-first century India must get out of this heinous and criminal caste system. It must be abolished if India wants to remain united and civilised where each one lives with Equality, Liberty and Fraternity as Baba Saheb Ambedkar had visualized, then it must follow the humanist path shown by him and reject the old caste order.