Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Caste Dalit Bahujan Adivasi

Only 3 Special Courts in Maharashtra under SC/ST Act

In the winter session of Parliament, many pertinent questions relating to Dalits and Adivasis are being asked. Two such questions were put forth on November 19 and 21 in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, respectively.

Sabrangindia 22 Nov 2019

SC ST

After the shocking Supreme Court verdict of 2018 which justified stringent conditions for the process of arrest under the SC/ST Act based on alleged misuse, defying the purpose and spirit of the law, the government has now made some amendments making the procedure of arrest slightly less tedious. In the light of this, effective implementation of the law at State level needs to be monitored and relevant questions have been raised in the Parliament.
 

Cases registered under the SC/ST Act

In the Lok Sabha, Kodikunnil Suresh, of Congress Party, asked the Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment for information on number of cases of murders registered during the last five year in each state under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 (SC/ST Act). Since the National Crime Records Bureau has only recently released data till 2017, the data thus provided by the Ministry was only up until 2017.

As per the data, Uttar Pradesh was the State which topped the list with maximum number of SC ST deaths. From 2013 to 2017, Uttar Pradesh had 1,170 such cases, 2016 being the year with the highest number of cases, which was 271 cases. States like Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Mizoram had no cases registered under the Act, in the period between 2013-2017. This could be because of lack of awareness about the law or general apathy.

The question also asked whether the Government intends to withdraw the SC/ST Act as per the Supreme Court verdict in Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs. State of Maharashtra of March 2018. The Ministry, however said that certain amendments were made and enforced in August 2018 which reinforced the law and made it stringent. While the judgment of the Supreme Court had directed that any arrest under the Act of a “public servant can only be after approval of the appointing authority and of a non-public servant after approval by the S.S.P. which may be granted in appropriate cases if considered necessary for reasons recorded.”

The amendment to the Act, which came after the judgment, however, clearly stated, by inserting section 18 A:

“18A. (1) For the purposes of this Act,-

(a) preliminary enquiry shall not be required for registration of an FIR against any person; or

(b) the investigating officer shall not require approval for the arrest, if necessary, of any person, against whom an accusation of having committed an offence under this Act has been made and no procedure other than that provide under this Act or the Code shall apply.

(2) The provisions of section 438 of the Code shall not apply to a case under this Act, notwithstanding any judgment or order or direction of any Court”

The above amendment was contradictory to the judgement, which had inclined towards some regressive views and had failed to take into account the true purpose and spirit of the law, only owing to “abuse of law” in that particular case.
 

Special Courts under the SC/ST Act

On November 21, Ripun Bora, of Congress party, raised the question regarding number of Special Courts established as per the provisions under the Act and sought State wise data of the same. The question was also pertaining to pendency of cases under the Act.

With respect to number of Special Courts, the data indicated that such courts had been set up in only 12 States with Madhya Pradesh having the maximum number i.e. 43 special courts under the SC/ST Act, followed by Uttar Pradesh which has 40 Special Courts while Andhra Pradesh has only 1. The number of Special Courts in Maharashtra is only 3, which seems sparse considering the State has seen 283 cases of deaths under the SC/ST Act between 2013-2017. On the other hand, Tamil Nadu registered 228 such cases in the same period and has 6 Special Courts.

In many states the District Sessions Court had been designated as Special court since the Act provides that “in Districts where less number of cases under this Act is recorded, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, specify for such Districts, the Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under the Act.”

The data provided by the Ministry revealed that in 2017, a total of 5,553 cases under the Act ended in conviction and 1,75,409 cases were pending in court by the end of 2017.

A reading of the data indicates that while states where the incidents under the SC/ST Act have consistently seen a rise, have buckled up and set up Special Court to deal with the cases expeditiously while some other States are falling short in the implementation of the provisions of the Act.


Related:
Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India, 2013
Babasaheb Ambedkar: A Man Far Ahead of His Times
Caste Discrimination and Related Laws in India
Only eight out of India's 20 IIMs have Dalit-Adivasi faculty
TN gov’t sets free Dalit massacre convicts, Madras HC demands answers

 

 

Only 3 Special Courts in Maharashtra under SC/ST Act

In the winter session of Parliament, many pertinent questions relating to Dalits and Adivasis are being asked. Two such questions were put forth on November 19 and 21 in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, respectively.

SC ST

After the shocking Supreme Court verdict of 2018 which justified stringent conditions for the process of arrest under the SC/ST Act based on alleged misuse, defying the purpose and spirit of the law, the government has now made some amendments making the procedure of arrest slightly less tedious. In the light of this, effective implementation of the law at State level needs to be monitored and relevant questions have been raised in the Parliament.
 

Cases registered under the SC/ST Act

In the Lok Sabha, Kodikunnil Suresh, of Congress Party, asked the Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment for information on number of cases of murders registered during the last five year in each state under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 (SC/ST Act). Since the National Crime Records Bureau has only recently released data till 2017, the data thus provided by the Ministry was only up until 2017.

As per the data, Uttar Pradesh was the State which topped the list with maximum number of SC ST deaths. From 2013 to 2017, Uttar Pradesh had 1,170 such cases, 2016 being the year with the highest number of cases, which was 271 cases. States like Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Mizoram had no cases registered under the Act, in the period between 2013-2017. This could be because of lack of awareness about the law or general apathy.

The question also asked whether the Government intends to withdraw the SC/ST Act as per the Supreme Court verdict in Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs. State of Maharashtra of March 2018. The Ministry, however said that certain amendments were made and enforced in August 2018 which reinforced the law and made it stringent. While the judgment of the Supreme Court had directed that any arrest under the Act of a “public servant can only be after approval of the appointing authority and of a non-public servant after approval by the S.S.P. which may be granted in appropriate cases if considered necessary for reasons recorded.”

The amendment to the Act, which came after the judgment, however, clearly stated, by inserting section 18 A:

“18A. (1) For the purposes of this Act,-

(a) preliminary enquiry shall not be required for registration of an FIR against any person; or

(b) the investigating officer shall not require approval for the arrest, if necessary, of any person, against whom an accusation of having committed an offence under this Act has been made and no procedure other than that provide under this Act or the Code shall apply.

(2) The provisions of section 438 of the Code shall not apply to a case under this Act, notwithstanding any judgment or order or direction of any Court”

The above amendment was contradictory to the judgement, which had inclined towards some regressive views and had failed to take into account the true purpose and spirit of the law, only owing to “abuse of law” in that particular case.
 

Special Courts under the SC/ST Act

On November 21, Ripun Bora, of Congress party, raised the question regarding number of Special Courts established as per the provisions under the Act and sought State wise data of the same. The question was also pertaining to pendency of cases under the Act.

With respect to number of Special Courts, the data indicated that such courts had been set up in only 12 States with Madhya Pradesh having the maximum number i.e. 43 special courts under the SC/ST Act, followed by Uttar Pradesh which has 40 Special Courts while Andhra Pradesh has only 1. The number of Special Courts in Maharashtra is only 3, which seems sparse considering the State has seen 283 cases of deaths under the SC/ST Act between 2013-2017. On the other hand, Tamil Nadu registered 228 such cases in the same period and has 6 Special Courts.

In many states the District Sessions Court had been designated as Special court since the Act provides that “in Districts where less number of cases under this Act is recorded, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, specify for such Districts, the Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under the Act.”

The data provided by the Ministry revealed that in 2017, a total of 5,553 cases under the Act ended in conviction and 1,75,409 cases were pending in court by the end of 2017.

A reading of the data indicates that while states where the incidents under the SC/ST Act have consistently seen a rise, have buckled up and set up Special Court to deal with the cases expeditiously while some other States are falling short in the implementation of the provisions of the Act.


Related:
Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India, 2013
Babasaheb Ambedkar: A Man Far Ahead of His Times
Caste Discrimination and Related Laws in India
Only eight out of India's 20 IIMs have Dalit-Adivasi faculty
TN gov’t sets free Dalit massacre convicts, Madras HC demands answers

 

 

Related Articles

Thursday

12

Dec

India Gate, New Delhi

Thursday

12

Dec

Press Club, Near Azad Maidan, Mumbai

Wednesday

11

Dec

11 am onwards

Protest against CAB

Jantar Mantar, New Delhi

Theme

Ambedkar

On India's 70th Constitution Day, the Subversive Sangh

Repeated attempts by the RSS-driven Sangh Parivar to appropriate Dr BR Ambedkar throw up contradictions and evasions
JNU

‘Stand by JNU!’ Solidarity Statements from across the world

A campaign launched by the university’s students and teachers challenging the intolerance of dissent
Hindutva

Hindutva and Democracy

Communalism Combat 9th Anniversary Special
HCU

#Stand with HCU

Solidarity Statements and Video Testimonies

Campaigns

Thursday

12

Dec

India Gate, New Delhi

Thursday

12

Dec

Press Club, Near Azad Maidan, Mumbai

Wednesday

11

Dec

11 am onwards

Protest against CAB

Jantar Mantar, New Delhi

Videos

Communalism

Massive Protests against CAB in Aligarh

Students from Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) staged massive protests against Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB. Students claimed that the bill is unconstitutional while they shouted slogans of ‘Communalism down down’ and ‘say no to CAB bill’.

Communalism

Massive Protests against CAB in Aligarh

Students from Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) staged massive protests against Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB. Students claimed that the bill is unconstitutional while they shouted slogans of ‘Communalism down down’ and ‘say no to CAB bill’.

Analysis

Ambedkar

On India's 70th Constitution Day, the Subversive Sangh

Repeated attempts by the RSS-driven Sangh Parivar to appropriate Dr BR Ambedkar throw up contradictions and evasions
JNU

‘Stand by JNU!’ Solidarity Statements from across the world

A campaign launched by the university’s students and teachers challenging the intolerance of dissent
Hindutva

Hindutva and Democracy

Communalism Combat 9th Anniversary Special
HCU

#Stand with HCU

Solidarity Statements and Video Testimonies

Archives