Kerala HC judge says Brahmins should be at the Helm of Affairs, asks them to agitate against Reservations
Says that they are born twice due to good deeds, sparks controversy
Sparking controversies and criticisms, a sitting judge of the Kerala High Court, Justice V Chitambaresh recently made casteist remarks at a ‘Tamil Brahmin’s Global Meet’ conducted on Friday in Kochi by Kerala Brahmana Mahasabha.
Calling Brahmins dwijhanmana or twice born, he went on to describe some supposed characteristics of Brahmins saying that they have “clean habits, lofty thinking, sterling character, mostly a vegetarian, a lover of Carnatic music” and basically “all good qualities rolled into one”. These ideas have been previously contested by scholars on the basis that this promotes the concept of pure and impure, where, while the Brahmins are seen to be of pure origins, the Dalits and Other backward castes are seen as impure.
The judge proceeded to opine about the ‘rich heritage’ of Agraharams (temple land given to Brahmins by kings) remarking that the areas around such land should be preserved. "There are innumerable agraharams in Kerala, which needs to be preserved. There is a rich cultural heritage. The agraharams have to be declared as heritage source and we shall not permit any flat to be built in between the agraharams - in between the houses in the agraharams."
Though he kept saying that “it may not be proper” for him to “express any opinion” he called on the Brahmin community to agitate for economic reservation saying that there is a platform for Brahmins to “agitate or to voice” their “concern about economic reservation alone, and not caste or communal reservation.” He said, “Of course, there is a 10% reservation for economically backward classes. A son of a Brahmin cook, even if he falls within the non-creamy layer zone, will not get any reservation. Whereas, a son of a timber merchant who belongs to other backward communities will get reservation if he is within the non-creamy layer zone. I am not expressing any opinion at all, it is for you to deliberate and put forward your opinion.”
The judge then moved to remark that “more of Veda Padshaalas which are now dwindling should be encouraged”.
Towards the conclusion, he said that the Brahmins should always be at the helm of the affairs. "It may be noted that a Brahmin is never communal, he is always considerate, he is an ahimsavadi (proponent of peace). He loves people, he is one who liberally donates for any laudable cause. Such a person should always be at the helm of affairs for which this Tamil Brahmin meet will definitely be a turning point," he said.
An alumnus of Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Justice Chitambaresh started his practice in 1981 and was designated Senior Advocate in November 2007. In November 2011, he was sworn-in as an Additional Judge of the Kerala High Court. In December 2012, he was made permanent judge.
His remarks, which can be easily called casteist, were criticised by social media users. Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi said on Twitter that he disagreed with the judge. “I would simply disagree with Lordship and say that all humans are born equal,” Singhvi tweeted.
Having a clearly biased stand on caste, the judge has, in the past, upheld values of civil liberties.
In October 2017, a division Bench headed by him ordered the release of a Hindu girl from the detention of her family to marry her Muslim lover. He had said, “We caution that every case of inter-religious marriage shall not be portrayed on a religious canvas and create fissures in the communal harmony otherwise existing in the God’s own country.”
Last year, he also authored a judgment allowing a person to live with transgender community, dismissing the habeas plea of the mother.
However, it’s hard to say that these judgments can whitewash the blatantly casteist remarks the Judge has made at a time when the society if rife with caste based atrocities and even after 74 years of independence, caste discrimination has continued in the country.
Sparking controversies and criticisms, a sitting judge of the Kerala High Court, Justice V Chitambaresh recently made casteist remarks at a ‘Tamil Brahmin’s Global Meet’ conducted on Friday in Kochi by Kerala Brahmana Mahasabha.
Calling Brahmins dwijhanmana or twice born, he went on to describe some supposed characteristics of Brahmins saying that they have “clean habits, lofty thinking, sterling character, mostly a vegetarian, a lover of Carnatic music” and basically “all good qualities rolled into one”. These ideas have been previously contested by scholars on the basis that this promotes the concept of pure and impure, where, while the Brahmins are seen to be of pure origins, the Dalits and Other backward castes are seen as impure.
The judge proceeded to opine about the ‘rich heritage’ of Agraharams (temple land given to Brahmins by kings) remarking that the areas around such land should be preserved. "There are innumerable agraharams in Kerala, which needs to be preserved. There is a rich cultural heritage. The agraharams have to be declared as heritage source and we shall not permit any flat to be built in between the agraharams - in between the houses in the agraharams."
Though he kept saying that “it may not be proper” for him to “express any opinion” he called on the Brahmin community to agitate for economic reservation saying that there is a platform for Brahmins to “agitate or to voice” their “concern about economic reservation alone, and not caste or communal reservation.” He said, “Of course, there is a 10% reservation for economically backward classes. A son of a Brahmin cook, even if he falls within the non-creamy layer zone, will not get any reservation. Whereas, a son of a timber merchant who belongs to other backward communities will get reservation if he is within the non-creamy layer zone. I am not expressing any opinion at all, it is for you to deliberate and put forward your opinion.”
The judge then moved to remark that “more of Veda Padshaalas which are now dwindling should be encouraged”.
Towards the conclusion, he said that the Brahmins should always be at the helm of the affairs. "It may be noted that a Brahmin is never communal, he is always considerate, he is an ahimsavadi (proponent of peace). He loves people, he is one who liberally donates for any laudable cause. Such a person should always be at the helm of affairs for which this Tamil Brahmin meet will definitely be a turning point," he said.
An alumnus of Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Justice Chitambaresh started his practice in 1981 and was designated Senior Advocate in November 2007. In November 2011, he was sworn-in as an Additional Judge of the Kerala High Court. In December 2012, he was made permanent judge.
His remarks, which can be easily called casteist, were criticised by social media users. Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi said on Twitter that he disagreed with the judge. “I would simply disagree with Lordship and say that all humans are born equal,” Singhvi tweeted.
Having a clearly biased stand on caste, the judge has, in the past, upheld values of civil liberties.
In October 2017, a division Bench headed by him ordered the release of a Hindu girl from the detention of her family to marry her Muslim lover. He had said, “We caution that every case of inter-religious marriage shall not be portrayed on a religious canvas and create fissures in the communal harmony otherwise existing in the God’s own country.”
Last year, he also authored a judgment allowing a person to live with transgender community, dismissing the habeas plea of the mother.
However, it’s hard to say that these judgments can whitewash the blatantly casteist remarks the Judge has made at a time when the society if rife with caste based atrocities and even after 74 years of independence, caste discrimination has continued in the country.
Kerala HC judge says Brahmins should be at the Helm of Affairs, asks them to agitate against Reservations
Says that they are born twice due to good deeds, sparks controversy
Sparking controversies and criticisms, a sitting judge of the Kerala High Court, Justice V Chitambaresh recently made casteist remarks at a ‘Tamil Brahmin’s Global Meet’ conducted on Friday in Kochi by Kerala Brahmana Mahasabha.
Calling Brahmins dwijhanmana or twice born, he went on to describe some supposed characteristics of Brahmins saying that they have “clean habits, lofty thinking, sterling character, mostly a vegetarian, a lover of Carnatic music” and basically “all good qualities rolled into one”. These ideas have been previously contested by scholars on the basis that this promotes the concept of pure and impure, where, while the Brahmins are seen to be of pure origins, the Dalits and Other backward castes are seen as impure.
The judge proceeded to opine about the ‘rich heritage’ of Agraharams (temple land given to Brahmins by kings) remarking that the areas around such land should be preserved. "There are innumerable agraharams in Kerala, which needs to be preserved. There is a rich cultural heritage. The agraharams have to be declared as heritage source and we shall not permit any flat to be built in between the agraharams - in between the houses in the agraharams."
Though he kept saying that “it may not be proper” for him to “express any opinion” he called on the Brahmin community to agitate for economic reservation saying that there is a platform for Brahmins to “agitate or to voice” their “concern about economic reservation alone, and not caste or communal reservation.” He said, “Of course, there is a 10% reservation for economically backward classes. A son of a Brahmin cook, even if he falls within the non-creamy layer zone, will not get any reservation. Whereas, a son of a timber merchant who belongs to other backward communities will get reservation if he is within the non-creamy layer zone. I am not expressing any opinion at all, it is for you to deliberate and put forward your opinion.”
The judge then moved to remark that “more of Veda Padshaalas which are now dwindling should be encouraged”.
Towards the conclusion, he said that the Brahmins should always be at the helm of the affairs. "It may be noted that a Brahmin is never communal, he is always considerate, he is an ahimsavadi (proponent of peace). He loves people, he is one who liberally donates for any laudable cause. Such a person should always be at the helm of affairs for which this Tamil Brahmin meet will definitely be a turning point," he said.
An alumnus of Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Justice Chitambaresh started his practice in 1981 and was designated Senior Advocate in November 2007. In November 2011, he was sworn-in as an Additional Judge of the Kerala High Court. In December 2012, he was made permanent judge.
His remarks, which can be easily called casteist, were criticised by social media users. Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi said on Twitter that he disagreed with the judge. “I would simply disagree with Lordship and say that all humans are born equal,” Singhvi tweeted.
Having a clearly biased stand on caste, the judge has, in the past, upheld values of civil liberties.
In October 2017, a division Bench headed by him ordered the release of a Hindu girl from the detention of her family to marry her Muslim lover. He had said, “We caution that every case of inter-religious marriage shall not be portrayed on a religious canvas and create fissures in the communal harmony otherwise existing in the God’s own country.”
Last year, he also authored a judgment allowing a person to live with transgender community, dismissing the habeas plea of the mother.
However, it’s hard to say that these judgments can whitewash the blatantly casteist remarks the Judge has made at a time when the society if rife with caste based atrocities and even after 74 years of independence, caste discrimination has continued in the country.
Sparking controversies and criticisms, a sitting judge of the Kerala High Court, Justice V Chitambaresh recently made casteist remarks at a ‘Tamil Brahmin’s Global Meet’ conducted on Friday in Kochi by Kerala Brahmana Mahasabha.
Calling Brahmins dwijhanmana or twice born, he went on to describe some supposed characteristics of Brahmins saying that they have “clean habits, lofty thinking, sterling character, mostly a vegetarian, a lover of Carnatic music” and basically “all good qualities rolled into one”. These ideas have been previously contested by scholars on the basis that this promotes the concept of pure and impure, where, while the Brahmins are seen to be of pure origins, the Dalits and Other backward castes are seen as impure.
The judge proceeded to opine about the ‘rich heritage’ of Agraharams (temple land given to Brahmins by kings) remarking that the areas around such land should be preserved. "There are innumerable agraharams in Kerala, which needs to be preserved. There is a rich cultural heritage. The agraharams have to be declared as heritage source and we shall not permit any flat to be built in between the agraharams - in between the houses in the agraharams."
Though he kept saying that “it may not be proper” for him to “express any opinion” he called on the Brahmin community to agitate for economic reservation saying that there is a platform for Brahmins to “agitate or to voice” their “concern about economic reservation alone, and not caste or communal reservation.” He said, “Of course, there is a 10% reservation for economically backward classes. A son of a Brahmin cook, even if he falls within the non-creamy layer zone, will not get any reservation. Whereas, a son of a timber merchant who belongs to other backward communities will get reservation if he is within the non-creamy layer zone. I am not expressing any opinion at all, it is for you to deliberate and put forward your opinion.”
The judge then moved to remark that “more of Veda Padshaalas which are now dwindling should be encouraged”.
Towards the conclusion, he said that the Brahmins should always be at the helm of the affairs. "It may be noted that a Brahmin is never communal, he is always considerate, he is an ahimsavadi (proponent of peace). He loves people, he is one who liberally donates for any laudable cause. Such a person should always be at the helm of affairs for which this Tamil Brahmin meet will definitely be a turning point," he said.
An alumnus of Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Justice Chitambaresh started his practice in 1981 and was designated Senior Advocate in November 2007. In November 2011, he was sworn-in as an Additional Judge of the Kerala High Court. In December 2012, he was made permanent judge.
His remarks, which can be easily called casteist, were criticised by social media users. Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi said on Twitter that he disagreed with the judge. “I would simply disagree with Lordship and say that all humans are born equal,” Singhvi tweeted.
Having a clearly biased stand on caste, the judge has, in the past, upheld values of civil liberties.
In October 2017, a division Bench headed by him ordered the release of a Hindu girl from the detention of her family to marry her Muslim lover. He had said, “We caution that every case of inter-religious marriage shall not be portrayed on a religious canvas and create fissures in the communal harmony otherwise existing in the God’s own country.”
Last year, he also authored a judgment allowing a person to live with transgender community, dismissing the habeas plea of the mother.
However, it’s hard to say that these judgments can whitewash the blatantly casteist remarks the Judge has made at a time when the society if rife with caste based atrocities and even after 74 years of independence, caste discrimination has continued in the country.
Related articles
Related Articles
Communalism
Hate and the Balasore train tragedy: Welcome to 2023 India
A temple near the accident site, an ISKCON temple was dubbed a Mosque to spin conspiracy theories. If you thought that the worst train tragedy possibly since Independence should unite all Indians in a moment of stunned grief, think again. The sponsored Hate Ecosystem on Twitter and other social media found even this an occasion to spin hate tales and spew venom: Welcome to 2023 India
Communalism
Hate and the Balasore train tragedy: Welcome to 2023 India
A temple near the accident site, an ISKCON temple was dubbed a Mosque to spin conspiracy theories. If you thought that the worst train tragedy possibly since Independence should unite all Indians in a moment of stunned grief, think again. The sponsored Hate Ecosystem on Twitter and other social media found even this an occasion to spin hate tales and spew venom: Welcome to 2023 India
Theme
A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back
Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Campaigns
Videos
Communalism
Bastar violence: Anti-Christian Campaign causes breach in Adivasi unity
Hundreds of Adivasi church-goers across villages in Narayanpur and Bastar, Chhattisgarh have been experiencing boycott, intimidation and violence since December last year, forcing them to leave their homes and live in refugee camps. Reportedly, Adivasi districts across Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh is seeing a rise Hindutva mobilisation against Christians .
Communalism
Bastar violence: Anti-Christian Campaign causes breach in Adivasi unity
Hundreds of Adivasi church-goers across villages in Narayanpur and Bastar, Chhattisgarh have been experiencing boycott, intimidation and violence since December last year, forcing them to leave their homes and live in refugee camps. Reportedly, Adivasi districts across Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh is seeing a rise Hindutva mobilisation against Christians .
Archives
IN FACT
Podcasts
Analysis
A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back
Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Freedom
Govt teacher suspended for FB post critical of K’ka CM Siddaramaiah’s freebies
