Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Rule of Law

Govt lawyers absent for FRA hearing as millions of tribals inch closer to froced eviction

Sabrangindia 15 Feb 2019

Central government lawyers remained absent as Supreme Court inched closer to ordering forced eviction of more than 1 million tribals and other forest dwellers recently


Tribals 
Representation Image

New Delhi: What tribal activists and organizations had warned about has happened again.
 
In a letter written around February 4, leaders of the Communist Party of India, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), former member of the Adivasi Congress, along with two organizations working for Adivasi and forest dwellers’ rights, Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch, All India Forum of Forest Movements and Campaign for Survival and Dignity, to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, said that in pending cases in the Supreme Court seeking to have this crucial Act struck down, the Central government’s lawyer had said nothing in the defence of the law for all of the past three hearings.
 
Central government lawyers remained absent as Supreme Court inched closer to ordering forced eviction of more than 1 million tribals and other forest dwellers recently. The last time large scale evictions of tribals were undertaken by the government under Vajpayee's NDA regime between 2002-2004.
 
The court’s orders on February 13, with central government lawyers missing during the hearing, gave rise the next day to a political slugfest with the opposition claiming the BJP was not doing enough to safeguard tribal rights.
 
Congress President Rahul Gandhi alleged in a tweet that the absence of central government lawyers in court betrayed its "intention" to drive out lakhs of tribals and poor farmers from forests.
 
“The Supreme Court ordered states to report what action they’re taking against tribals and forest-dwellers whose claims to forestlands have been rejected under the Forest Rights Act. The court’s February 13 order came in a case filed by wildlife groups demanding that people whose claims have been rejected under the law be treated as encroachers and evicted from forestlands,” Business Standard reported.
 
If the court accepts the plea of petitioners, state governments would have to undertake mass evictions. The union ministry for tribal affairs estimates that by the end of November 2018, out of the 4.2 million claims received, 1.94 million claims have been rejected. As many as 1.89 million claimants have actually got titles over their traditional forestlands, the report said.
 
The law, passed in 2006, requires the government to give back rights over traditional forestlands to tribals and other forest-dwellers. Through a laid down process, people are permitted to lay claims before authorities. These authorities, based on criteria set in the law and regulations, are required to either approve or reject the claims with several layers of appeals being available to claimants, the report added.
 
The report said that “The court’s orders came while hearing a case filed by wildlife groups and retired forest officers raising a legal challenge on the constitutional validity of the law. The case was originally filed in 2009. The petition, besides challenging the constitutional validity of the law, also demanded that those whose claims had been rejected be evicted as ‘encroachers’. The petitioners also have demanded that those who are not scheduled tribes should not be handed back traditional forestlands under the law.”
 
On February 13, when the court heard the matter again the lawyer for the petitioner pushed the case for eviction. Justice Arun Mishra noted that state reports had not reported any eviction. In fact, four states have reported some evictions.
 
The court demanded that state chief secretaries submit affidavits explaining why no action has been undertaken subsequent to the rejection of claims that have attained finality and what steps have been taken after the rejection of claims.
 
This led Congress president Rahul Gandhi on Thursday to allege that BJP was standing as a "silent spectator" in the face of the Forest Rights Act being challenged in the court.
 
The law was enacted in UPA’s second tenure but faced with opposition from within various forest departments and others, the progress under it to hand over individual and community titles has been tardy and has been tardy and inefficient. Both the UPA and the NDA governments have subsequently diluted some of the regulations under the law which make acquisition of traditional forestlands for development and industrial projects difficult, the report added.
 
“With general elections around the corner, any eviction of tribals in central India – a tribal heartland - precipitated by court orders could lead to potential political damage to the ruling party. It was such evictions carried out across the country, on the interpretation of an earlier apex court orders, which led to mass-scale protests when more than 300,000 people were evicted between 2002-2004. The then NDA government with Atal Bihari Vajpayee as Prime Minister had informed the Parliament that evictions were carried from 152,400 hectares of forest land over the two-year period,” the report said.
 
“The Congress, when it came into power as part of the United Progressive Alliance legislated the Forest Rights Act in 2006 to counter such mass-scale evictions that did not consider historical displacement of tribals from forests due to the continuation of colonial-era forest laws,” the report said.
 

Govt lawyers absent for FRA hearing as millions of tribals inch closer to froced eviction

Central government lawyers remained absent as Supreme Court inched closer to ordering forced eviction of more than 1 million tribals and other forest dwellers recently


Tribals 
Representation Image

New Delhi: What tribal activists and organizations had warned about has happened again.
 
In a letter written around February 4, leaders of the Communist Party of India, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), former member of the Adivasi Congress, along with two organizations working for Adivasi and forest dwellers’ rights, Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch, All India Forum of Forest Movements and Campaign for Survival and Dignity, to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, said that in pending cases in the Supreme Court seeking to have this crucial Act struck down, the Central government’s lawyer had said nothing in the defence of the law for all of the past three hearings.
 
Central government lawyers remained absent as Supreme Court inched closer to ordering forced eviction of more than 1 million tribals and other forest dwellers recently. The last time large scale evictions of tribals were undertaken by the government under Vajpayee's NDA regime between 2002-2004.
 
The court’s orders on February 13, with central government lawyers missing during the hearing, gave rise the next day to a political slugfest with the opposition claiming the BJP was not doing enough to safeguard tribal rights.
 
Congress President Rahul Gandhi alleged in a tweet that the absence of central government lawyers in court betrayed its "intention" to drive out lakhs of tribals and poor farmers from forests.
 
“The Supreme Court ordered states to report what action they’re taking against tribals and forest-dwellers whose claims to forestlands have been rejected under the Forest Rights Act. The court’s February 13 order came in a case filed by wildlife groups demanding that people whose claims have been rejected under the law be treated as encroachers and evicted from forestlands,” Business Standard reported.
 
If the court accepts the plea of petitioners, state governments would have to undertake mass evictions. The union ministry for tribal affairs estimates that by the end of November 2018, out of the 4.2 million claims received, 1.94 million claims have been rejected. As many as 1.89 million claimants have actually got titles over their traditional forestlands, the report said.
 
The law, passed in 2006, requires the government to give back rights over traditional forestlands to tribals and other forest-dwellers. Through a laid down process, people are permitted to lay claims before authorities. These authorities, based on criteria set in the law and regulations, are required to either approve or reject the claims with several layers of appeals being available to claimants, the report added.
 
The report said that “The court’s orders came while hearing a case filed by wildlife groups and retired forest officers raising a legal challenge on the constitutional validity of the law. The case was originally filed in 2009. The petition, besides challenging the constitutional validity of the law, also demanded that those whose claims had been rejected be evicted as ‘encroachers’. The petitioners also have demanded that those who are not scheduled tribes should not be handed back traditional forestlands under the law.”
 
On February 13, when the court heard the matter again the lawyer for the petitioner pushed the case for eviction. Justice Arun Mishra noted that state reports had not reported any eviction. In fact, four states have reported some evictions.
 
The court demanded that state chief secretaries submit affidavits explaining why no action has been undertaken subsequent to the rejection of claims that have attained finality and what steps have been taken after the rejection of claims.
 
This led Congress president Rahul Gandhi on Thursday to allege that BJP was standing as a "silent spectator" in the face of the Forest Rights Act being challenged in the court.
 
The law was enacted in UPA’s second tenure but faced with opposition from within various forest departments and others, the progress under it to hand over individual and community titles has been tardy and has been tardy and inefficient. Both the UPA and the NDA governments have subsequently diluted some of the regulations under the law which make acquisition of traditional forestlands for development and industrial projects difficult, the report added.
 
“With general elections around the corner, any eviction of tribals in central India – a tribal heartland - precipitated by court orders could lead to potential political damage to the ruling party. It was such evictions carried out across the country, on the interpretation of an earlier apex court orders, which led to mass-scale protests when more than 300,000 people were evicted between 2002-2004. The then NDA government with Atal Bihari Vajpayee as Prime Minister had informed the Parliament that evictions were carried from 152,400 hectares of forest land over the two-year period,” the report said.
 
“The Congress, when it came into power as part of the United Progressive Alliance legislated the Forest Rights Act in 2006 to counter such mass-scale evictions that did not consider historical displacement of tribals from forests due to the continuation of colonial-era forest laws,” the report said.
 

Related Articles

Rule of Law

Draconian UAPA provisions, constitutionality challenged in the SC

The most recent challenge to the UA(P)A is a petition filed that makes the case that vague language and arbitrary provisions violate allow governments to abuse powers and violate the fundamental rights of the citizens

Rule of Law

Draconian UAPA provisions, constitutionality challenged in the SC

The most recent challenge to the UA(P)A is a petition filed that makes the case that vague language and arbitrary provisions violate allow governments to abuse powers and violate the fundamental rights of the citizens


Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives