Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Politics

CAB 2019 is not just Unconstitutional, it is meant to create communal divides

Vidya Bhushan Rawat 05 Dec 2019

CAB
 

The proposed Citizenship amendment bill is an assault on the Constitution of India which does not base our citizenship on our religious or caste identities. On the one hand, the government says that it want to welcome people living in Islamic countries but immediately suggest that Muslims are not wanted. If makes a clear assumption that all the Muslims living in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are happier because they have a 'Islamic' government very much like all the 'Hindus' in India are happy with the BJP ascendancy in power. Or else even if they are not, India is no place for them.

 

The amendments also imply that all the non Muslims in these countries are not happy there and have no constitutional guarantee. It is true that in the South Asian neighborhood most are majoritarian societies (like us!)  and there are 'extra-state' actors of the majoritarian communities which are beyond the control of the government everywhere including in India. We know very well who such forces are in India, those who have no care for our constitution and have violated it most of the time without being penalised.

 

What started from the North East has now been imposed on the whole country. The issue in Assam and other part of North East was never communal but a sense that genuine demographic changes in these states were taking place. This was during the post 1971 period after the Bangladesh war but दो projected as such by chauvinist forces, this was never due to Muslim population. The Assam agitation even at its height, started by movement like All Assam Student Union and All Assam Gan Sangram Parishad was not outrightly communal.  The agitation was against illegal infiltrators which any country or state has when the situation goes out of hand.

 

The infiltrators were not merely Muslims, a majority of them were Bengali Hindus. There is no doubt a fact that minorities in our neighborhood lived a difficult life and laws like the Blasphemy laws have been used against minorities to compel them leave their spaces or business.

 

Indian state have always played dangerous games in dealing with 'refugees' and their 'settlement' which has resulted in tensions in many places. In the partition era, Bengali Hindus and Sikhs were settled in those places which were adivasi areas resulting in misuse of resources and illegal land grab of the Adivasi land. Take the case of Pilibhit, Lakhimpur Khiri and Shaheed Udham Singh Nagar district in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand which have a huge Sikh population. Frankly speaking a majority of them got settled here in the aftermath of partition but slowly the powerful among them used the politeness and simplicity of the Adivasis to grab their land. The result is that there is a complete demographic change in these regions and most of the adivasi land has been grabbed by the power elite among these Sikhs. Most of the Adivasis like Tharus and Boxas in these Tarai region have become landless in their own homeland.

 

The Bengali Namashudra community was initially settled in Dandkarnaya region, which was in Chhattishgarh which neither had their culture nor language. Ultimately all of them went to Bengal and got settled in Sundarvan region or Marichjhaapi. There too, the Bengali Bhadralok refugees got land in prime locations in  Kolkata or even in Delhi but the Dalits were given land in far away places.

 

The demography of Tripura changed and the indigenous people became a minority there in their own region. Can you imagine that Tripura's political dominance is in the hands of non indigenous people!

 

Look at Jharkhand, an Adivasi state which has now more of a non Adivasi population and non Adivasi chief minister. Uttarakhand's non hills district will dominate the politics in future as their population is growing at a much faster rate while the hills have negative population growth. Moreover, industries and business of the outsiders now dominate the hill district of Uttarakhand. Soon, the non Uttarakhandi's will dominate the state politics and culture.

 

Even if you open up India's space for outsiders, we wish to know as where does Indian state want to 'settle' the refugees or those who want to come to India ? Indian government has already assured the North Eastern States that it wont settle them in these regions as their MPs raised concern. Will Himachal and Uttarakhand also raise the same issue ? Will these state accept huge chunks of refugees ? If yes, wont there be a demographic change in these states ? Why should we allow this, whether Hindus or Muslim or any one else.

 

Indian citizenship does not discriminate on the basis of religion. Nowhere in the world is this kind of discrimination. Once you are an Indian citizen, you are Indian. Indian government cannot bring all Hindus from all over the world and take care of them. This is absolutely horrendous.

 

Does the current regime think that these issues did not crop up during the partition?  In fact, there were lots of these issues and discussions. Why should India think that all the Hindus world over have fundamental right to settle in India just because it is their 'fatherland', as espoused by Savarkar?

 

So, those who lived here for centuries will be hounded out while those who are citizens of other countries are being brought here. Will that not create a crisis here ? Does the government think that merely being Hindu is enough ? How does government settle them and how will the local population take them. Will they be settled in Punjab or Haryana or Uttar Pradesh or Delhi?

 

If the government is suggesting that 'Indian'  doors open on an individual basis then why cant the basis be of the relationship with India and not religion-based?  The contents of the current bill is against the spirit of the constitution and has a one point agenda to harass the Muslim citizens of the country. It is sad how the current regime is working on this design which diverts our attention from the real issues of economic recession, unemployment, climate change. Returning all the time to its favourite pass-time of Muslim bashing.

 

Perhaps the government has not read up on minority rights and its international laws. Every modern progressive country respect its minorities and feel proud of them. Many of the non native Hindus have prime ministers and president of various countries and we feel proud of them. India too had that approach and we are immensely proud of those Indian leaders who might not have been brahmanical Hindus but of other faiths and contributed for our country.

 

It would have been better if India took a lead on minority Rights issues globally but then for that we needed to have moral high ground and our own track record. It is deeply disturbing that rather than introspecting on its fault line, the BJP leaders continue to think that they can get rich dividend in elections due politics of polarisation and creation of an anti Muslim climate all over the country.

 

All political parties must stand together and oppose this bill which divide us deeply. It is not the duty of the Muslims to fight for their rights but all of us, Indian citizens who must stand together and speak up against such a discriminatory bill.

 

It appears as if our role models are not Germany, France or UK but Saudi Arabia, Taliban or other countries which are theocratic states. Fact of the matter is, many of the middle eastern countries are changing and accepting diversity. Hindi has become second language of administration in Abu Dhabi court. Oman recently got a Hindu temple and Indians are welcomed in all these middle eastern countries who give us employment not by seeing our religion but our capacities and qualities. I

 

Isnt it ironical, that India which started with strong secular socialist foundations today is turning to those outdated and tainted ideas which have been rejected by countries suffering due to theocracy and discriminatory laws.

 

We hope the Supreme Court will take cognizance of these bills when they become law and stand up for a vibrant and robust democracy and not those ideas which takes us towards brahmanical theocracy, for which India has already paid huge price.

 

It is time that political parties speak up against this bill apart from the legal luminaries who can challenge this in the court of law. Indians need to unite against a power which want to thrive on our divisions and deviate from the real issues so that it can 'silently' sale off all our 'resources' to its favorite cronies.

CAB 2019 is not just Unconstitutional, it is meant to create communal divides

CAB
 

The proposed Citizenship amendment bill is an assault on the Constitution of India which does not base our citizenship on our religious or caste identities. On the one hand, the government says that it want to welcome people living in Islamic countries but immediately suggest that Muslims are not wanted. If makes a clear assumption that all the Muslims living in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are happier because they have a 'Islamic' government very much like all the 'Hindus' in India are happy with the BJP ascendancy in power. Or else even if they are not, India is no place for them.

 

The amendments also imply that all the non Muslims in these countries are not happy there and have no constitutional guarantee. It is true that in the South Asian neighborhood most are majoritarian societies (like us!)  and there are 'extra-state' actors of the majoritarian communities which are beyond the control of the government everywhere including in India. We know very well who such forces are in India, those who have no care for our constitution and have violated it most of the time without being penalised.

 

What started from the North East has now been imposed on the whole country. The issue in Assam and other part of North East was never communal but a sense that genuine demographic changes in these states were taking place. This was during the post 1971 period after the Bangladesh war but दो projected as such by chauvinist forces, this was never due to Muslim population. The Assam agitation even at its height, started by movement like All Assam Student Union and All Assam Gan Sangram Parishad was not outrightly communal.  The agitation was against illegal infiltrators which any country or state has when the situation goes out of hand.

 

The infiltrators were not merely Muslims, a majority of them were Bengali Hindus. There is no doubt a fact that minorities in our neighborhood lived a difficult life and laws like the Blasphemy laws have been used against minorities to compel them leave their spaces or business.

 

Indian state have always played dangerous games in dealing with 'refugees' and their 'settlement' which has resulted in tensions in many places. In the partition era, Bengali Hindus and Sikhs were settled in those places which were adivasi areas resulting in misuse of resources and illegal land grab of the Adivasi land. Take the case of Pilibhit, Lakhimpur Khiri and Shaheed Udham Singh Nagar district in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand which have a huge Sikh population. Frankly speaking a majority of them got settled here in the aftermath of partition but slowly the powerful among them used the politeness and simplicity of the Adivasis to grab their land. The result is that there is a complete demographic change in these regions and most of the adivasi land has been grabbed by the power elite among these Sikhs. Most of the Adivasis like Tharus and Boxas in these Tarai region have become landless in their own homeland.

 

The Bengali Namashudra community was initially settled in Dandkarnaya region, which was in Chhattishgarh which neither had their culture nor language. Ultimately all of them went to Bengal and got settled in Sundarvan region or Marichjhaapi. There too, the Bengali Bhadralok refugees got land in prime locations in  Kolkata or even in Delhi but the Dalits were given land in far away places.

 

The demography of Tripura changed and the indigenous people became a minority there in their own region. Can you imagine that Tripura's political dominance is in the hands of non indigenous people!

 

Look at Jharkhand, an Adivasi state which has now more of a non Adivasi population and non Adivasi chief minister. Uttarakhand's non hills district will dominate the politics in future as their population is growing at a much faster rate while the hills have negative population growth. Moreover, industries and business of the outsiders now dominate the hill district of Uttarakhand. Soon, the non Uttarakhandi's will dominate the state politics and culture.

 

Even if you open up India's space for outsiders, we wish to know as where does Indian state want to 'settle' the refugees or those who want to come to India ? Indian government has already assured the North Eastern States that it wont settle them in these regions as their MPs raised concern. Will Himachal and Uttarakhand also raise the same issue ? Will these state accept huge chunks of refugees ? If yes, wont there be a demographic change in these states ? Why should we allow this, whether Hindus or Muslim or any one else.

 

Indian citizenship does not discriminate on the basis of religion. Nowhere in the world is this kind of discrimination. Once you are an Indian citizen, you are Indian. Indian government cannot bring all Hindus from all over the world and take care of them. This is absolutely horrendous.

 

Does the current regime think that these issues did not crop up during the partition?  In fact, there were lots of these issues and discussions. Why should India think that all the Hindus world over have fundamental right to settle in India just because it is their 'fatherland', as espoused by Savarkar?

 

So, those who lived here for centuries will be hounded out while those who are citizens of other countries are being brought here. Will that not create a crisis here ? Does the government think that merely being Hindu is enough ? How does government settle them and how will the local population take them. Will they be settled in Punjab or Haryana or Uttar Pradesh or Delhi?

 

If the government is suggesting that 'Indian'  doors open on an individual basis then why cant the basis be of the relationship with India and not religion-based?  The contents of the current bill is against the spirit of the constitution and has a one point agenda to harass the Muslim citizens of the country. It is sad how the current regime is working on this design which diverts our attention from the real issues of economic recession, unemployment, climate change. Returning all the time to its favourite pass-time of Muslim bashing.

 

Perhaps the government has not read up on minority rights and its international laws. Every modern progressive country respect its minorities and feel proud of them. Many of the non native Hindus have prime ministers and president of various countries and we feel proud of them. India too had that approach and we are immensely proud of those Indian leaders who might not have been brahmanical Hindus but of other faiths and contributed for our country.

 

It would have been better if India took a lead on minority Rights issues globally but then for that we needed to have moral high ground and our own track record. It is deeply disturbing that rather than introspecting on its fault line, the BJP leaders continue to think that they can get rich dividend in elections due politics of polarisation and creation of an anti Muslim climate all over the country.

 

All political parties must stand together and oppose this bill which divide us deeply. It is not the duty of the Muslims to fight for their rights but all of us, Indian citizens who must stand together and speak up against such a discriminatory bill.

 

It appears as if our role models are not Germany, France or UK but Saudi Arabia, Taliban or other countries which are theocratic states. Fact of the matter is, many of the middle eastern countries are changing and accepting diversity. Hindi has become second language of administration in Abu Dhabi court. Oman recently got a Hindu temple and Indians are welcomed in all these middle eastern countries who give us employment not by seeing our religion but our capacities and qualities. I

 

Isnt it ironical, that India which started with strong secular socialist foundations today is turning to those outdated and tainted ideas which have been rejected by countries suffering due to theocracy and discriminatory laws.

 

We hope the Supreme Court will take cognizance of these bills when they become law and stand up for a vibrant and robust democracy and not those ideas which takes us towards brahmanical theocracy, for which India has already paid huge price.

 

It is time that political parties speak up against this bill apart from the legal luminaries who can challenge this in the court of law. Indians need to unite against a power which want to thrive on our divisions and deviate from the real issues so that it can 'silently' sale off all our 'resources' to its favorite cronies.

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives