Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom

Bombay HC hits the brakes on Coastal Road project, quashes CRZ clearance

Sabrangindia 16 Jul 2019

The Bombay High court has set aside the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance for the much hyped Coastal Road project that aims to connect Marine Drive in South Mumbai to the northern suburb of Kandivali.


coastal road

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and justice NM Jamdar was hearing a batch of petitions against the Rs 14,000 crore project that has drawn sharp criticism from activists, residents who live along the coast and the fishing community. The PILs were filed in response to the CRZ clearance granted by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) in May 2017. Petitioners objected to the construction of a proposed 10 kilometer long stretch from Marine Drive to Bandra, stating that it would cause damage to the coastline as well as marine life in the region.

A key aspect of the petition also dealt with fisher-folk who stand to lose their livelihoods if the project is allowed to go through. In fact the Worli Koliwada Nakhwa Matsya Vyavasay Sahkari Society Ltd. and the Worli Machimmar Sarvodaya Sahakari Society, were two of the key petitioners against the coastal road. Other key petitioners include environmental activist Debi Goenka, the Bombay Environmental Action Group, the Conservation Action Trust, architect Shweta Wagh, Vanashakti, Society for Improvement, Greenery and Nature, etc.   

The court studied, with a keen eye for detail, all submissions and went through the details of meetings conducted and other actions taken by the government to understand the real repercussions of the project. After this the court held that, “there is lack of proper scientific study and this has been overlooked by MCZMA, EIA and MoEF warranting the approval granted by MCZMA on 4th January 2017, the approval granted by EAC on 17th March 2017 and the final approval granted by MoEF on 11th May, 2017 are liable to be quashed and set aside.” The court ruled, “We quash the decision taken by MCZMA on 4th January 2017 and the approval granted by MoEF on 11th May 2017 on said ground alone.”

The court had reserved judgment on July 1 and it was delivered on July 16. The entire judgment may be read here.

 

Bombay HC hits the brakes on Coastal Road project, quashes CRZ clearance

The Bombay High court has set aside the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) clearance for the much hyped Coastal Road project that aims to connect Marine Drive in South Mumbai to the northern suburb of Kandivali.


coastal road

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and justice NM Jamdar was hearing a batch of petitions against the Rs 14,000 crore project that has drawn sharp criticism from activists, residents who live along the coast and the fishing community. The PILs were filed in response to the CRZ clearance granted by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) in May 2017. Petitioners objected to the construction of a proposed 10 kilometer long stretch from Marine Drive to Bandra, stating that it would cause damage to the coastline as well as marine life in the region.

A key aspect of the petition also dealt with fisher-folk who stand to lose their livelihoods if the project is allowed to go through. In fact the Worli Koliwada Nakhwa Matsya Vyavasay Sahkari Society Ltd. and the Worli Machimmar Sarvodaya Sahakari Society, were two of the key petitioners against the coastal road. Other key petitioners include environmental activist Debi Goenka, the Bombay Environmental Action Group, the Conservation Action Trust, architect Shweta Wagh, Vanashakti, Society for Improvement, Greenery and Nature, etc.   

The court studied, with a keen eye for detail, all submissions and went through the details of meetings conducted and other actions taken by the government to understand the real repercussions of the project. After this the court held that, “there is lack of proper scientific study and this has been overlooked by MCZMA, EIA and MoEF warranting the approval granted by MCZMA on 4th January 2017, the approval granted by EAC on 17th March 2017 and the final approval granted by MoEF on 11th May, 2017 are liable to be quashed and set aside.” The court ruled, “We quash the decision taken by MCZMA on 4th January 2017 and the approval granted by MoEF on 11th May 2017 on said ground alone.”

The court had reserved judgment on July 1 and it was delivered on July 16. The entire judgment may be read here.

 

Related Articles

Saturday

07

Dec

Parel, Mumbai

Saturday

07

Dec

Jantar Mantar

Theme

Ambedkar

On India's 70th Constitution Day, the Subversive Sangh

Repeated attempts by the RSS-driven Sangh Parivar to appropriate Dr BR Ambedkar throw up contradictions and evasions
JNU

‘Stand by JNU!’ Solidarity Statements from across the world

A campaign launched by the university’s students and teachers challenging the intolerance of dissent
Hindutva

Hindutva and Democracy

Communalism Combat 9th Anniversary Special
HCU

#Stand with HCU

Solidarity Statements and Video Testimonies

Campaigns

Saturday

07

Dec

Parel, Mumbai

Saturday

07

Dec

Jantar Mantar

Tuesday

10

Dec

New Delhi

Analysis

Ambedkar

On India's 70th Constitution Day, the Subversive Sangh

Repeated attempts by the RSS-driven Sangh Parivar to appropriate Dr BR Ambedkar throw up contradictions and evasions
JNU

‘Stand by JNU!’ Solidarity Statements from across the world

A campaign launched by the university’s students and teachers challenging the intolerance of dissent
Hindutva

Hindutva and Democracy

Communalism Combat 9th Anniversary Special
HCU

#Stand with HCU

Solidarity Statements and Video Testimonies

Archives